The Snow Maiden (1968)

The Snow Maiden

Continuing our foray into the colorful world of Russian fairy tale cinema, The Snow Maiden (1968), like its protagonist, has a foot in two different worlds. It has touches of the candy-coated, hyper-imaginative fairy tale films of Aleksandr Ptushko (Sadko, The Tale of Tsar Saltan), but with an introspective and adult tone, slower pace, and charged, eerie atmosphere more in tune with 60’s art-house fantasy films like Juliet of the Spirits (1965) and Kwaidan (1964). If it doesn’t compare in impact to those films, perhaps it’s because it’s a commissioned Soviet work paying straight-faced tribute to one of the Motherland’s great artists, Aleksandr Ostrovsky, who wrote the 1873 play The Snow Maiden, based on an old folktale. (The film was released in honor of Ostrovsky’s 150th birthday.) Or perhaps The Snow Maiden simply needs to choose between those two worlds: does it want to be a Russian fairy tale genre film, replete with handsome men operatically singing, or does it want to be an art film with more raw, adult themes?

One of the spirits of the wood, pledged to protect the Snow Maiden from harm.

One of the spirits of the wood, pledged to protect the Snow Maiden from harm.

Two key players keep the film from being just another fairy tale. One is the director, Pavel Kadochnikov, a veteran Russian actor who also appears in the film (looking quite a bit like Sean Connery) as the Tsar Berendey. Kadochnikov, like many actor-turned-directors, focuses his attention on the emotions of the characters; the Snow Maiden might be the daughter of Father Frost, but he only puts in a brief cameo at the beginning of the film, deliberately obscured by a snowstorm. There will be no huts with chicken legs here, nor three-headed dragons. The second key player is the composer, Vladislav Kladnitsky, whose score borders on the experimental, and does much to provide that particular eerie feeling. It’s completely at odds with the festive folk music which the villagers celebrate throughout, another element of the film’s strange dissonance. (One of the most famous incarnations of this tale is the 19th century opera by Nikolai Rimsky-Korsakov. Kladnitsky seems to consciously take his score in the extreme opposite direction.)

Young maidens eagerly dote on the visiting Misghir (Boris Khimichev).

Young maidens eagerly dote on the visiting Misghir (Boris Khimichev).

In medieval Russia, the Snow Maiden (Yevghenia Filonova) refuses to depart with Father Frost to Siberia for warmer months, lured as she is by the happy villagers enjoying a Shrovetide celebration in the snow. He agrees to let her enjoy spring with the villagers, but only after entrusting her safety to the “wood genies” of the forest, strange, moss-covered creatures who emerge from shrubs and swamp. In the village, the Snow Maiden falls under the thrall of an elderly couple in poverty who wishes to sell her beauty for a rich dowry. Though the frosty Snow Maiden cannot love, she quickly becomes attached to the young singer Lel (Evgeniy Zharikov), who is smitten with her, and whose songs she admires. When a rich merchant, Misghir (Boris Khimichev), arrives (also singing) from upriver, he quickly scorns his fiancée Kupava (Irina Gubanova) for the Snow Maiden. Tsar Berendey tells Misghir that he cannot have the girl unless she returns his affections, but the merchant only frightens the snow-spirit; at one point Misghir becomes so desperate in his obsession for the unobtainable Snow Maiden that he nearly rapes her. Lel, meanwhile, falls in love with Kupava, and the Snow Maiden, despairing, turns to her mother, Spring, to learn the gift of love. In doing so – as the old folktale goes – she melts away, seen here in a symbolic shot of the maiden dissolving in a beam of sunlight. Misghir dies of grief.

The people of the village worship Yarilo, the Slavic god of the springtime, symbolized by the Sun.

The people of the village worship Yarilo, the Slavic god of the springtime, symbolized by the Sun.

Kadochnikov films most of this in an appropriately somber manner, but despite his evident intention to deliver a more serious fairy tale, he also gives the audience their expected comic relief characters (three brothers, ancillary to the plot), extraneous songs, and wacky monsters (the wood-sprites look like something from the world of Sid & Marty Krofft). Much time is spent among the characters of the village and the developing love triangles, but in these scenes I found myself more interested in the beautiful costumes of the maidens and the elaborate wooden architecture of the village; the script itself couldn’t hold my attention. At just ninety minutes, the film feels too long. Otherwise, it requires more elaboration of ideas floated during the final scenes – such as the wood-sprites coming to the Snow Maiden’s protection and dazzling Misghir with their magic; or the arrival of her mother, striding over water like the Lady in the Lake. Or, to the point, the film needs to examine the import of a fairy tale in which a woman is given the gift of love for a man wholly undeserving. The Snow Maiden fails to satisfy on those points. It’s one of the more interesting variants of this genre, attempting to appeal as much to adults as to children, but perhaps it wouldn’t melt from the memory so quickly if it committed fully to one or the other.

The Snow Maiden

Posted in Theater Fantastique | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on The Snow Maiden (1968)

The Tale of Tsar Saltan (1967)

The Tale of Tsar Saltan

Aleksandr Ptushko’s penultimate special effects fantasy (before the sublime Ruslan and Ludmila) was The Tale of Tsar Saltan (1967), based on another of Pushkin’s poems and filled with rhyming dialogue and rich storybook imagery. The film opens with a Pushkin book being opened to an illustration of three maidens pining for the unwed tsar before Ptushko dissolves into live-action. The women are unaware that they’re being spied upon by the tsar himself (Vladimir Andreyev, distractingly buried under a bright orange beard and heavy eyeshadow), and after listening to their promises, he bursts into the room and chooses the young sister (Larisa Golubkina) who promises him a strong and brave offspring; then he spirits her away to his castle. The two jealous sisters plot the destruction of the Tsarina. While Saltan is at war with some cannibalistic trolls, he receives a forged message stating that his heir has been born, and the creature is a monster. Another forged letter in the Tsar’s name tells the boyars of the palace that they must take the Tsarina and her (perfectly healthy, albeit fast-growing) son and place them in a barrel sealed with pitch, then thrown into the sea (a scene reminiscent of Clash of the Titans). By the time the Tsar returns to the palace, he is told his wife and son are dead, and the two evil sisters are there to comfort him.

The exiled Tsarina (Larisa Golubkina) approves of the marriage of her son Guidon (Oleg Vidov) and the Swan Princess (Ksenia Ryabinkina).

The exiled Tsarina (Larisa Golubkina) approves of the marriage of her son Guidon (Oleg Vidov) and the Swan Princess (Ksenia Ryabinkina).

Meanwhile, the Tsarina and her son, the now fully-grown Guidon (Oleg Vidov), emerge from their barrel on a secluded island. Guidon, hunting for food, slays a kite that threatens a swan. The swan transforms into a princess (Ksenia Ryabinkina) and guides mother and son to a walled castle where all its residents are frozen in time: a girl is forever pulling a goat, a fountain’s sparkling water is held stiffly in place, and men running through the street are kept impossibly still. Guidon lifts the spell and becomes prince of the city, and is shortly given a tour of its wonders, which includes golden acorns cracked by a singing squirrel-puppet. All the women wish to marry him, but are kept at bay by the Swan Princess, whose heart the prince has already won. She shows him her army of giants, who march out from underneath the sea. And she transforms the prince into a mosquito so he can visit his mourning father, Saltan, and even bite one of the evil sisters on her eye. Soon enough the Tsar is reunited with his wife and son, the sisters are forgiven their sins, and Guidon marries his Swan Princess.

Giants of the sea attack a boat fleeing the island castle.

Giants of the sea attack a boat fleeing the island castle.

The aesthetic of the film is that of a Maxfield Parrish painting, and the matte paintings are a wonder to behold. But it’s also chock full of the expected Ptushko tricks, gags, and surreal loopiness. He strives to remind us at every moment that this is a world of fairy tale exaggeration, and applies his animator’s expressiveness to live-action effects. In one scene, the lion statues sitting on the arms of his throne grow startled and scamper off (a brief but convincing shot with dogs in costume). When the enchanted mosquito zips through the throne room, actors leap away from it in trampoline-bounces. Action is often accelerated or played in reverse. The sea-giants are achieved through a clever mix of rear projection, optical matting, forced perspective, and miniature props – depending on the shot, a different effect is used. And then there’s that singing squirrel, reminding us of Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs, but played with an utterly goofy mechanical puppet. The playful innocence and simplicity of the film is difficult to resist: this is a lovingly crafted children’s film. If you have the Ruscico DVD, be sure to treat yourself to the animated film included with the Special Features. A gem from the legendary Soviet Soyuzmultfilm animation studio, the exquisite half-hour short from 1950 retells the Russian fairy tale “The Fisherman and the Goldfish.”

The Tale of Tsar Saltan

 

Posted in Theater Fantastique | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on The Tale of Tsar Saltan (1967)

Double Feature: Remember Last Night? (1935)/Somewhere in the Night (1946)

Remember Last Night

My memory isn’t so great these days; and, anyway, memory plays tricks. Do I remember Remember Last Night? (1935)…let’s see, it was a couple days ago, and I’ll be damned if I can remember who actually did it in this whodunit. But I don’t think I properly understood whodidit when they first told me. Director James Whale probably wouldn’t mind. Remember Last Night? is a screwball comedy which borrows more than a little from The Thin Man (1934), the classic Dashiell Hammett adaptation that inspired multiple sequels and a loyal following. Instead of Nick & Nora Charles, married alcoholic sleuths, Whale – fresh off The Bride of Frankenstein (1935) – gives us Tony & Carlotta Milburn (Robert Young, Constance Cummings), frivolous socialites who only become crime-solving partners out of necessity: someone’s been murdered after a wild party at their mansion, but none of the hungover partygoers can remember what happened. The film adapts a book called The Hangover Murders by Adam Hobhouse, and indeed anticipates The Hangover (2009) by a good seven decades. The mystery feels sketched-in and second-hand, and there are so many characters that most make no impression, therefore all revelations about the murder seem irrelevant; you didn’t really know who the victim and the perpetrator were in the first place. It doesn’t really matter. The point of Remember Last Night? is to deliver Depression-era audiences into luxurious mansions for a farce with decadent and carefree caricatures, like so many other screwball comedies of its day.

Robert Young and Constance Cummings prepare for some merry drunk-driving in "Remember Last Night?"

Robert Young and Constance Cummings prepare for some merry drunk-driving in “Remember Last Night?”

Its chief strengths are its nonstop wit – it would take a second viewing to catch all the gags in the Marx Brothers-style banter – and its stubborn refusal to be realistic. Whale acknowledges the artifice of the proceedings on multiple occasions. When our drunks see a ship on the horizon, it’s obviously a prop on a stylized set. They prepare to fire a cannon at it, and Whale, with delirious absurdity, cuts to close-ups of sailors’ faces, giving them a dramatic introduction, as though every character inhabiting this ship will be of vital importance; then the ship speeds away across the set like something in a Looney Tunes cartoon. He even has Carlotta reference The Bride of Frankenstein before she sees something that makes her scream, a visual reference to the most iconic moment of the same film. Elsewhere, a truck driver unleashes a rant strung together of elaborate working-class insults, then comments quietly to himself, “I feel better.” These jokes all have quotation marks around them, like something out of Mel Brooks or a work of postmodernism – a reminder that modern comedies didn’t invent everything. (On the other hand, a brief scene in which the partygoers don masks of blackface to perform racist impressions reminds the contemporary viewer that nothing is really “timeless.”) Whale is more restrained here than in Bride, but he allows himself a few visual flourishes, such as the wild, hallucinatory party and a late scene in which a hypnotist arrives to help the suspects recall the previous night’s events, the spiral of his spinning wheel casting a giant dizzying shadow on the wall and on Robert Young’s face. Remember Last Night? isn’t a lost classic, but those who’ve run out of Thin Man to watch, and prefer their detectives to be frivolous romantics and unapologetic alcoholics, should take a look.

John Hodiak as George Taylor, amnesiac.

John Hodiak as George Taylor, amnesiac, in “Somewhere in the Night.”

Remember Last Night? was recently screened at the University of Wisconsin-Madison by Canadian director Guy Maddin (Brand Upon the Brain!, The Saddest Music in the World), mainly because he just wanted to see it again. He only dimly recalled the film, but remembered liking it. (As he apologetically stated in the post-film Q&A, he forgot about the blackface scene.) Trying to retrieve or reconstruct lost films was a major theme of a lecture he gave on campus, “Loss in the Cinema,” so a film about memory loss, which Maddin himself couldn’t quite remember, was an appropriate choice. I would suggest following Remember Last Night? with a chaser on the same topic, Somewhere in the Night (1946), which is a classic, albeit in a different decade and a different subgenre altogether. Joseph L. Mankiewicz (All About Eve) directs this gripping mystery which we would retroactively classify as noir. John Hodiak (Lifeboat) returns from the war an amnesiac. He is told his name is George Taylor, and among his few belongings is a note from a woman stating that she despises him and is ashamed for ever having loved him: “I shall pray for as long as I live for someone to hurt and destroy you.” This is why we can call this film noir – it’s bleak: a man finds himself trapped in the body of someone who is loathed and rejected at the start. He tells us in voiceover: “Who writes letters like this? Who do they write them to? Men they despise, whose memories they despise – the memory I haven’t got!”

Fritz Kortner as Anzelmo, with his crystal ball.

Fritz Kortner as Anzelmo, with his crystal ball.

A detective investigating the mystery of himself, his trail leads him to a note from someone named Larry Cravat, who has deposited five thousand dollars in George Taylor’s bank account. Searching for Cravat takes him deep into a criminal underworld and, ultimately, a race to uncover stolen loot. In this quest his only friends are Christy Smith (Nancy Guild), a Lauren Bacall-esque showgirl with a heart of gold, and club owner Mel Phillips (Richard Conte). Mankiewicz, who co-wrote the screenplay with Howard Dimsdale (none other than Lee Strasberg gets a credit for adaptation), reliably builds his films brick-solid. Unlike Remember Last Night?, you care about this mystery, because you sympathize with George Taylor, just as you believe his developing romance with girl-next-door Christy. There’s also something irresistible about the amnesia subgenre. The answers are all within his head, if only he could unlock them. Increasingly George worries that he may not be the hero of the piece, but the villain; Hodiak is great in this role, and though he has scenes of stock hard-boiled banter, more often you can read the fear and anxiety on his features. He’s a Little Boy Lost in a dangerous and cynical world. What if he is a scumbag, worthy of that anonymous rejection letter? What if he is a thief and a killer? In Remember Last Night?, we never seriously consider that Robert Young might have killed his houseguest, it’s only a matter of how many jokes he and Constance Cummings have to crack before the real culprit is exposed. What makes Somewhere in the Night so effective is that it muddies the moral waters; Hodiak may be a good guy now, but perhaps he’s nothing more than a criminal who’s achieved innocence through the act of forgetting. Maybe our innocence is nothing but self-delusion, a trick of the mind, a trick of memory: this is the dark psychological territory that film noir, at its best, teases out into the light. Yet both of these films play with memory – or lack thereof – in clever ways, suggesting that sometimes the least reliable witness to a crime can be one’s self.

Remember Last Night Somewhere in the Night

Posted in Double Feature, Theater Smoking Gun | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Double Feature: Remember Last Night? (1935)/Somewhere in the Night (1946)