Le Pont du Nord (1981)

There is an ancient game called jeu de l’oie, or the “Game of the Goose.” Players throw dice and progress through a spiral path divided into sixty-three spaces. The goal is to be the first to reach the center, and landing on a Goose or a Bridge can be advantageous, advancing your piece further along the path. But many of those spaces contain traps, the nature of which varies from board to board. You can be delayed by landing on the Prison or the Inn, and if you’re unlucky enough to land on Death, you will be plunged back to the start. It’s an ancient game of uncertain origins, but provided the literal roadmap for modern-day board games such as Monopoly or The Game of Life. Wikipedia informs me that in Jules Verne’s Le Testament d’un excentrique (The Will of an Eccentric, 1899), part of his Voyages Extraordinaires series of novels, a millionaire wills his fortune to the one who can complete his Game of the Goose-inspired treasure hunt that uses the United States as one vast game-board (which means that Verne can list It’s a Mad, Mad, Mad, Mad World as one of his many successful predictions). Eight-two years later, filmmaker Jacques Rivette would make Le Pont du Nord (The North Bridge, 1981); halfway through the film, the two main characters realize that the nonsensical series of events in which they’re entangled can actually be mapped to the Game of the Goose, and by following its rules, they might progress one space at a time toward a solution – a goal that lies somewhere within the streets of Paris.

Ex-convict Marie (Bulle Ogier) and vagabond Baptiste (Pascale Ogier) try to decipher a mysteriously coded map of Paris.

Those two characters are Marie and Baptiste, women who are strangers to one another but form a fast and symbiotic partnership. (A recurring motif in Rivette’s work are two paired females; and one is deliberately reminded of his classic 70’s fantasy, Celine and Julie Go Boating.) One of the reasons they seem so perfectly matched is that actress Bulle Ogier, playing Marie (and veteran of both Rivette and Buñuel), is the real-life mother of her co-star Pascale Ogier, playing Baptiste. Tragically, Pascale, who appeared in Eric Rohmer’s Perceval (1978) and Full Moon in Paris (1984), would die in 1984 after a drug overdose. Here, Rivette’s camera cannot leave her intense gaze, which can be alternately amusing or unnerving – either naïve or dangerously unhinged. She meets the older Marie through a series of chance encounters, and on the third, deciding it’s fate, commits herself like a loyal dog, looking out for Marie with a knife and some martial arts moves, though it is not exactly clear, at first, why Marie could possibly need protection. Baptiste, a vagabond first seen patrolling Paris on a moped, detects danger everywhere. She tracks the number of lion statues she finds throughout the city, as though they belong to some indecipherable codex, or as if they are beasts that might suddenly lunge at her. When she confronts the ubiquitous advertisements plastered in posters on every wall, she slashes with her knife at the eyes of the models (or, in one case, a samurai in a poster for Kagemusha), paranoid she’s under “surveillance.” Marie accepts her services regardless, though she expresses skepticism that the girl’s name is really “Baptiste” (conspicuously offered only after she said her name was “Marie”), and does her best to convince the girl that the world is not really out to get them. Baptiste has her uses. Marie, who has just been released from prison after serving time for a bank robbery, has developed a phobia for confined spaces, and prefers not to step indoors, even when she just needs to order a croissant or deliver a postcard to her partner, who’s still behind bars. So when one needs to pee in the bushes, it’s handy to have Baptiste keeping a lookout, crouched in defense.

The MacGuffin, a map of Paris sought by gangsters.

But as Marie renews a connection with her lover, card shark Julien (Pierre Clementi), we begin to see the patterns that Baptiste does, like a folie à deux: strange connections, suspicious behaviors, familiar faces. A stranger makes a hilariously botched attempt to switch briefcases with Julien while his back is turned. A motorcyclist Baptiste distrusts at the start of the film now begins popping up wherever they go. Another man turns up dead. Baptiste calls these people “Maxes,” and to her, there’s a Max on every corner, which is why she’s always practicing her karate. When she steals Julien’s briefcase against Marie’s wishes, the two discover a collection of newspaper clippings, many of them sensational headlines regarding the French criminal Jacques Mesrine (who was killed by the police in 1979). Most curious is a map of Paris with a spiral drawn in black marker, which reminds Marie of the Game of Goose. Since they discovered a dead body lying in a graveyard, they use this as the key to decipher the code: they can now number the squares and see exactly where they stand in the game. But Baptiste is so taken by this particular conspiracy theory that she can’t stop drawing connections, and begins to see Maxes everywhere. In one memorable sequence, she envisions an urban flame-throwing dragon guarding a bridge, cementing her transformation into the film’s Don Quixote.

Baptiste confronts a "Max" - actually a harmless foreigner who was reluctant to surrender a phone booth to Marie.

Jacques Rivette helped to invent the French Nouvelle Vague, and yet his work remains so idiosyncratic that it seems reductive to classify him. Although, like his fellow critics-turned-directors from the influential Cahiers du Cinéma, he elevated and revered certain studio films and directors of decades past, he seems just as equally informed by literature (in this case, Cervantes) and the stage; he’s less overtly stylish than many of his peers, and is more concerned with the avant-garde but rigorous construction of his stories, which are like metaphysical labyrinths. His films also tend to be long – the notorious Out 1 (1971) is over twelve hours in length in some versions, though Le Pont du Nord is a more palatable 129 minutes. Doubtless these are all reasons why his films have never been as popular as those of Godard or Truffaut; to date his films are very hard to see in the States since so few are available on Region 1 DVD, and most of my viewings have been in revival screenings (such as this one, in a newly-subtitled 35mm print just screened in Madison). Yet I’ve never found a Rivette film unrewarding; his works are challenging but always playful, with a sharp sense of humor. Le Pont du Nord is intriguing for a number of reasons. As with his earlier films such as Celine and Julie Go Boating (1974) and Duelle (1976), the characters follow strictly outlined rules that, at first, seem random and meaningless, before he finally begins infusing them with purpose and gravity; we have to learn the game before we can play. The names of the doomed lovers, Marie and Julien, are reused in a belated pseudo-sequel, The Story of Marie and Julien (2003), which offers a few intriguing parallels to this film (I must revisit it soon). But what remains with the viewer is the film’s ultimate ambiguity: Marie and Baptiste’s indulgence in the fantastic both rewards and harms them. Rivette anticipates Terry Gilliam’s Brazil (1985) and especially The Fisher King (1991), in which Robin Williams plays a kind of Baptiste, with Jeff Bridges his accidentally-enabling Marie. The ending is both conclusive and elliptical. We may have reached the goal, yet we are still deep inside the labyrinth.

Posted in Theater Smoking Gun | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on Le Pont du Nord (1981)

Zombie Lake (1981)

When discussing the works of Shakespeare – and I think it’s important to begin with Shakespeare when discussing Zombie Lake (1981) – we classify the plays as comedies, histories, and tragedies, to make better sense of their structure and to identify commonalities and irregularities. Then there are the “problem plays”: those which do not fit neatly into any scholarly classification. Filmmaker Jean Rollin is a problem play. Ostensibly he is a horror director whose specialty was the vampire film, and whose key works are in the 1970’s, though he was directing up until his death in 2010. I’ve reviewed many of his best films on this site already, and I have great admiration for the poetry and haunting images found in his films, my particular favorites being Shiver of the Vampires (1971) and Lips of Blood (1975); the former works as a dark, erotic, and psychedelic fairy tale, and the latter calls to mind the dream-cinema of David Lynch. But between his heights were plummeting lows. Though he can be aligned with the tradition of French fantastique cinema and literature, and in his films paid tribute to old serials and the erotic fantasy art found in French comics, his work was not understood by critics; and in order to maintain a career behind the camera, he agreed to direct hardcore pornography between his personal projects. And even those personal projects would be increasingly compromised, as his preferred style of erotica bowed to the pressures of the grindhouse circuit, and longer and more explicit sex scenes were inserted into his films. Finally one must come to grips with the roughshod nature of so much of his work. Even in his best films there is variable acting, shoddy (or simply absent) FX, occasionally shaky camerawork and glaring flubs that a second or third take could have easily remedied. So how does one address a problem play like Jean Rollin? He is certainly unclassifiable, and for those who watch and rewatch his films, the flaws are part of the charm, like Dark Shadows fans acknowledging that occasionally the set will wobble or an actor will forget a line. And yet it seems even most Rollin fans have a hard time with Zombie Lake. So did Rollin, who treated it like he did his pornography: with a pseudonym.

A women's volleyball team (or "basketball team," as the dubbing tells us) visits Zombie Lake.

The film is credited to “J.A. Laser,” though the name “Jean Rollin” does appear in the credits as part of the cast. This says something. It says that he was more proud of his one-minute cameo as a German policeman getting hickeys from two soggy zombies than he was the entire ninety minutes of this rather hopeless film. Originally slated to direct was Jesús “Jess” Franco, the obscenely prolific Spanish director who, like Rollin, moved between genre films and porn to make his living. Eurocine, the distributor, had around 1980 brought in Rollin to add zombie scenes to Franco’s old quickie A Virgin Among the Living Dead (1973), creating a new, bastardized edit to exploit the Dawn of the Dead craze, and Zombie Lake would be a tired Romero rip-off through and through. Rollin is said to have regretted his decision to take over for Franco as soon as he read the script, but then, zombies were never really his thing. Zombies, after all, are typically lumbering and decomposing; he preferred female vampires in diaphanous nightgowns holding candelabras. The script’s monsters were all male, Nazi soldiers who take revenge upon the German villagers who murdered them and threw their bodies in a lake (“The Lake of the Ghosts”); a decade later they rise from the murk for their revenge. Still, there would be plenty of opportunity for naked female flesh. For some reason women love to skinny-dip in this particular lake. Which brings us to another popular film that Zombie Lake copies: Jaws. Rollin rather joylessly mimics Spielberg’s underwater shots of helpless legs treading water, only in this case it becomes an artless study of female genitalia before the zombies strike.

Director Jean Rollin's brief cameo.

I once read a post by a Rollin fan claiming that you could freeze-frame one of his films at any moment and discover a beautiful image. That is certainly not the case with Zombie Lake. One gets the sense that Rollin’s attitude was simply, “Let’s get this over with,” locked into the same mindset as his hardcore films. It is mercenary exploitation, with insipid dialogue and sex & violence dispensed at regular intervals (though there really isn’t much in the way of gore, as if the budget couldn’t accommodate). The only sign that a pulse beats behind the heart of this machine is an amusing subplot involving the young daughter of one of the murdered Nazis, reconnecting with her father when his bright-green corpse strolls into her room. Rollin plays these scenes with maximum absurdity, and for once I could sense that he’s in on the joke: one telling moment is that late in the film the girl greets her father by holding her arms straight out in the universal zombie greeting, to turn this into a warm embrace (he simply stares forward vacantly). Satisfyingly, it is the daughter who ultimately destroys the zombies by luring them into a cottage with a tasty bucket of blood, so that the villagers can burn the place down.

The devoted daughter welcomes her zombie father.

But that’s not enough to redeem Zombie Lake, which is a pretty terrible film by any standard. Rollin may not have signed his name to the film, but surely he could have taken this assignment and turned it into something a bit more interesting and against-the-grain. If you enjoy the film, it’s not in spite of but because of its flaws: the jaw-dropping shamelessness of its sexploitation elements (as soon as a girl’s volleyball team arrives at the lake, they toss the ball about for a few seconds and then strip naked); the incompetent staging of its WWII flashbacks (we hear planes roaring overhead and dropping bombs, but we see little more than a woman staring up at the sky and screaming); the horrendous acting (note that even when the zombies are rising from the lake, one at the far left is giving a completely different style of performance – see the screenshot at the beginning of this review). Even the underwater scenes in the lake are clearly filmed in a swimming pool; he scarcely attempts to hide the fact. So you can love Jean Rollin, and I still do. But never forget that for every Fascination (1979), there’s a Zombie Lake – and that’s a very interesting problem.

Zombie Lake is available in Netflix instant streaming in its English-dubbed version. Kino, as part of their Redemption line of releases, will be issuing a remastered Blu-Ray edition on February 26.

Posted in Theater Nilbog | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Zombie Lake (1981)

The Devil’s Rain (1975)

If cinema is to be believed, there was a period from about 1968 (and Rosemary’s Baby) through 1981 (and Omen III: The Final Conflict) in which Satan’s minions rose in throngs throughout the world, and we were ever on the brink of the Biblical Apocalypse. Babies were born with 666 scrawled on the scalp. Cultists dressed like Tolkien’s Ringwraiths lumbered about with torches and chanted in gobbledygook Latin over naked women chained to stone altars. Invisible devils hopped from one innocent body to another, and green vomit spattered the walls. Satanic horror took full advantage of the no-limits realm of 1970’s genre cinema, in the grindhouse and the mainstream drive-ins alike: for every Exorcist (1973) there were dozens of Exorcisms (1974) or Abbys (1974). Even television got a Look What’s Happened to Rosemary’s Baby (1976). So in the midst of all this madness, when the very earth was about to tear itself asunder by the mighty forces of black magic, it was strangely inevitable that the likes of William Shatner, Ernest Borgnine, Tom Skerritt, Eddie Albert, Ida Lupino, and John Travolta would travel to the American West for a good-and-evil battle in The Devil’s Rain (1975).

Cult leader Corbis (Ernest Borgnine) is confronted by the avenging Mark Preston (William Shatner) in a Satanic ghost town.

What makes this particular Satanic outing so intriguing is not the behind-the-scenes input of Satanic Bible author Anton Szandor LaVey – the film doesn’t seem to come within a country mile of anything “authentic” – but rather its delirious genre mash-up of a plot, for it’s quite obvious that The Devil’s Rain is actually a Western from the moment that Shatner and Borgnine square off on the dusty street of a ghost town wearing cowboy hats. (Never mind that Shatner’s cowboy hat appears to be made of wicker and would offer neither shade from the sun nor shelter from the rain, devil’s or otherwise.) That this moment happens so soon in the film is an indication that it has no time to waste – we are thrust into the middle of a plot we can scarcely grasp: first Mark Preston (Shatner) arrives home to find his father’s eyeless face melting off in a gooey mess, Lost Ark-style, as he comes stumbling out of the rain. He knows at once what is happening: the Satanist Jonathan Corbis (Borgnine) wants the return of a mysterious book that Preston and his mother (Lupino, a Hollywood legend) keep hidden away beneath the floorboards of their house. He travels to a deserted mining town called Red Stone with a magical amulet around his neck for protection, but when he meets up with Corbis in an old church used by the devil-worshipers, he discovers that his mother has now been corrupted – her eyes are now just black sockets – and he is quickly overcome by the chanting, black-cloaked cultists (one of whom is a pre-Kotter John Travolta).

Eddie Albert helps Tom Skerritt battle the forces of evil.

With Act One abruptly ended, the plot turns to Mark’s brother, Dr. Tom Preston (Tom Skerritt of Alien), a research scientist who begins the investigation of his family’s disappearance by first talking to the crusty sheriff (ubiquitous character actor Keenan Wynn), and then teaming up with Dr. Richards (Eddie Albert of Green Acres) to discover that his family’s prized book is actually a list of the names of disciples of Corbis’s centuries-old church, all written in blood and beside some pretty nifty illustrations of devils and the damned. Tom and his telepathic wife Julie (Joan Prather, who appeared with both Skerritt and Shatner in Big Bad Mama) head out to Red Stone where things fall apart fast: Satanists chase them through the wilderness, eyeless Travolta tries to kill them, Corbis transforms into a goat-man, and Richards discovers a large jar with a window (or television monitor) that gives a view to the tormented and rain-soppy souls of Corbis’s victims. The final ten minutes or so are given to face-melting and screaming, as the cultists disintegrate into puddles of green and yellow goo; this is followed by a “twist” ending that’s pretty typical of the genre.

Goat-man Borgnine wields a voodoo doll as he torments Shatner.

To call the film silly or hokey is beside the point; it is exactly what you need it to be, with each iconic actor amusingly indulging in their particular acting tics: Shatner pausing in his dialogue delivery; Borgnine gloating with Wild Bunch smarm; and Skerritt, in my favorite moment, expressing his frustration by fussing with his prop-glass, making a peculiar and meaningless unscrewing motion near its base, then smashing it against the desert rocks in impotent fury. But although the camp qualities are obvious, The Devil’s Rain is a cut above most of the Satanic-themed B-movies of the 70’s for a few reasons. One is the quality of the FX- there’s a reason the film decides to waste so much time on face-melting, which is that it’s pretty well done. Particularly impressive is Borgnine’s goat-man makeup, although it’s of such a high caliber, and so well-lit, that it perversely takes the film out of the realm of supernatural horror and into fantasy, even SF – Borgnine’s appearance in horns and flaring nostrils reminds one of a Planet of the Apes film or a particularly strange episode of Star Trek (fueled by Shatner’s presence). The second key element that makes The Devil’s Rain so notable is its British director, Robert Fuest, who had already made a significant mark on 70’s genre cinema with the Polanski-esque And Soon the Darkness (1970), the tongue-in-cheek Vincent Price vehicles The Abominable Dr. Phibes (1971) and Dr. Phibes Rises Again (1972), and the Michael Moorcock adaptation The Final Programme (1973). Fuest, who passed away last year, could always be counted on to deliver plenty of style with a small budget, and The Devil’s Rain is no exception, even if that style is applied to such absurd elements as Borgnine’s jar of the damned or psychic premonitions or Shatner engaging in fisticuffs with Satanists in the dusty streets of Red Stone. Recommended consumption for a Saturday night: pair this with Race with the Devil (1975), from the same year, and throw in some era-appropriate horror trailers in-between.

Rated PG for lots of green goo and magic amulets suddenly turning into snakes.

Posted in Theater Caligari | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on The Devil’s Rain (1975)