Fata Morgana (1971)

“In Paradise, man is born dead.” So speaks the gruff German narrator of the second movement of Werner Herzog’s apocalyptic travelogue, Fata Morgana (1971). The images support the thesis. This, Herzog’s third full-length feature film, depicts an African landscape littered with the stillborn: decaying animal cadavers, abandoned vehicles, empty hovels and deserted streets. If occasionally he seems to celebrate the country’s people, it may only be by accident. The tragic pall which hangs over so many of his films is very much in evidence in this narrative-free experiment, as he depicts a continent despoiled by Western influence and abandoned by the gods. Also: it’s a documentary. Also: it’s a science fiction film. As a child, Herzog was raised in isolation from pop culture in a remote Bavarian village; as a prolific creator of narrative and documentary films, he continually seeks to view the wide world with the unspoilt eyes of his childhood, imitating nothing, completely original. That’s Fata Morgana…an admittedly obscure entry in his filmography, but one that could emerge from only this director. Shot over the course of a year from 1968 to 1969, Herzog and his small crew traveled the Sahara, the Sahel, Kenya, and stops along the way, encountering uncooperative border guards, severe illness (Herzog came down with schistosomiasis, a parasitic disease prevalent in Africa), and the Cameroon military, who imprisoned and beat Herzog and his cameraman Jörg Schmidt-Reitwein, whom they had confused with a wanted mercenary – an incident Herzog is reluctant to discuss to this day. Returning home, it took him a few years to piece together the seemingly random footage he’d accumulated into a cohesive work; it finally debuted at the 1971 Cannes Film Festival, to little love.

Children strike a pose for Herzog's camera in "Fata Morgana."

The original notion of the film was that it would be a science fiction tale, dispatches from the planet Uxmal as told by explorers from Andromeda. (Herzog still holds to that idea, though he would revisit the cinéma-vérité-as-SF concept more overtly with 1992’s 54-minute Lessons of Darkness, paired with Fata Morgana on the Anchor Bay DVD.) Watching the film without that context – for, indeed, the narrators don’t provide it – you can still get the feel of the alien viewpoint, for Herzog’s camera seems continually baffled by the overwhelming and desolate landscape around him. It moves restlessly, scanning to the left and then to the right, surveying sand dunes, scattered animal corpses and the detritus of civilization, eventually buildings, and finally this land’s occupants: one rolling a giant tire through a street in the distance, another dragging a captive desert animal through the sands by a stick and noose. On the soundtrack, one of Herzog’s first champions, film critic and Nazi death camp survivor Lotte Eisner, reads a Mayan creation myth from the Popol Vuh. (“Popol Vuh” was also the name of the German musical group who scored many of Herzog’s major works of the 70’s and 80’s, including his breakthrough, 1972’s masterful Aguirre, the Wrath of God.) The creation myths being read seem especially appropriate in the film’s earliest scenes, a catalogue of desert mirages – the fata morgana of the title. As the horizon seems to become a blur of sky, earth, and water, we’re treated to a natural, visual representation of an Earth “formless and void.” Over and over, Herzog films planes that seem to join with a landing strip of water, evoking a union of technology and the Creation.

Through muddy, distorting acoustics, a couple perform in a claustrophobic dancehall for Herzog and his crew.

It’s either trippy and mesmerizing, or as dull as watching paint dry, depending on your disposition. Fata Morgana is nothing if not meditative, and the only thing Herzog asks of the viewer is to contemplate the images captured from his African journey. Still, it’s an eccentric assembly of images and sound. As the film moves into its second and third movements – from “Creation” to “Paradise” and “The Golden Age” – Eisner’s Popol Vuh readings, accompanied by the heavenly strains of Handel and Mozart, are traded for the music of Leonard Cohen and Blind Faith, and Herzog’s own absurdist script: “In Paradise, plane wrecks will be distributed in the desert in advance.” We also hear from some of the European inhabitants of this land, who look not only out of place, but like characters from Monty Python. Herzog simply films them and lets them pick their own topic: this one explaining how a lizard can endure the desert wild; another explaining “what we can learn from the turtle,” holding a sea turtle while wearing a diving suit. One couple sits on a stage – the man behind drums, wearing overlarge sunglasses; the woman severely observing her piano – as they pound through songs rendered incoherent by the muddy acoustics. They seem to occupy a dancehall in some alternate dimension. In scenes like these, Herzog demonstrates an affinity with his longtime friend (and friendly rival) Errol Morris, in particular Morris’ early films Gates of Heaven (1978) and Vernon, Florida (1981), which display the absurdity of humanity by simply turning a camera on everyday folks and letting the film roll. Though it doesn’t quite cohere as a concept, there are some pokes at colonialism in Herzog’s method. The Creation has finally given way to civilization, and it’s something he regrets; unless, perhaps, all of these dead animals, oil refineries, nuclear tests, and out-of-tune cabaret players are just more mirages – before the world lapses back into desert and dust. Herzog would explore these ideas more fully in works to come.

Posted in Theater Fantastique | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Fata Morgana (1971)

Fascination (1979)

Following Lips of Blood (1975), an artistic achievement in dream-like Gothic romanticism which he was financially compelled to re-edit and re-release as a bastardized, pornographic picture (Suce moi vampire), Jean Rollin entered the wilderness. He became Michel Gentil; he became Robert Xavier. Art was set aside in those lean years; un film de Jean Rollin was always a tough sell anyway, and it was time to pay the rent. One of those pictures, Phantasmes (aka The Seduction of Amy, 1975), he did sign with his own name – by all reports, it was a legitimate attempt to make an art film with hardcore elements. But the raincoat crowd wasn’t interested. It would not be until the latter years of the decade that Rollin returned with a vengeance, once again making the kind of languid fantastique that had bought him his small cult following in the first place: The Grapes of Death (Les Raisins de la Mort, 1978) and Fascination (1979). The latter, recently restored in high-definition for Kino Lorber’s Blu-Ray release, stands as one of Rollin’s finest and most haunting horror films.

Mark (Jean-Marie Lemaire) at the victrola.

Granted, it never seems quite right to label Rollin as a “horror” director – his allegiance was more to old French serials and comics, which he would render with a Surrealist’s eye – but Fascination seems to fit the genre well, while remaining unmistakably Rollin. It’s not another vampire film (though for a while the audience is hoodwinked into thinking it is); rather, it reveals itself to be a kind of slasher movie for intellectuals. We’re halfway through the running time when suddenly the beautiful Brigitte Lahaie dons a black robe over her nude body, then retrieves a giant, sharpened scythe from a barn and begins cutting some throats: Rollin’s vision of Death as an erotic, icy goddess with blonde hair and red, red lips. But the film begins with genre misdirection – a gang of bandits argue over some gold coins following a robbery (recalling earlier Rollin films Requiem for a Vampire, Schoolgirl Hitchhikers, and The Demoniacs). Mark (Jean-Marie Lemaire) absconds with the loot while the other criminals give chase, and takes shelter in a château surrounded by a moat, the only entrance a stone bridge. There he meets two women in white, Eva (Lahaie) and Elisabeth (Franca Maï). Ostensibly he takes them prisoner so he can occupy the manor for the evening, but very quickly it becomes unclear just who the real hostage is. They play the victims between fits of laughter: “What do you want from two girls like us, defenseless and at your mercy?” “I beg you not to kill us.” “You can rape us!” “I offer you my virginity in exchange for my life.” “Do with me what you want, but spare this child!” Eva seduces Mark, delaying him longer in the château. When he asks what the girls are doing there, and where the master of the house is, they only respond that the “madame” is returning that night with some friends. Something important will transpire at midnight. He needs to remain until then.

Eva (Brigitte Lahaie) at the scythe.

As the day wanes, Eva finds a means of dispersing the unwanted visitors besieging the château. First – to Mark’s alarm – she hands over the stolen coins, but they take her prisoner anyway. By the afternoon she’s returning across the bridge with a bloody scythe, every last bandit dead. Meanwhile, Elisabeth thinks she’s fallen in love with Mark, and warns him to leave before “Death” arrives at midnight – but by now his curiosity is piqued. When the “madame,” Hélène (Fanny Magier), finally arrives with a small party of young women, she warns him, “At midnight you will see what seven women can do to a lone man.” The balance of power continues to shift back and forth. When he wins a party game blindfolded, he uses his victory to dominate and humiliate Hélène. But then he finds a bloody body adrift in the moat, the women don red, transparent gowns, and the game turns against him. The film’s prologue – a striking scene of a beautiful socialite standing in a grisly abattoir, drinking ox blood as a treatment for anemia – circles back into the plot, as Mark discovers that the unorthodox medicine has produced a cult of blood-drinkers under the guidance of Hélène, and the unwary thief is the evening special.

Elisabeth (Franca Maï) and Eva at the candelabras.

Rollin discovered Lahaie in his Gentil/Xavier years (she had appeared in his hardcore film Vibrations sexuelles), and felt that her beauty and presence was deserving of mainstream attention. Regardless, her body is on display for much of Fascination, and with distribution worries in mind, he shot extended softcore footage which, thankfully, he didn’t need to use (the new Blu-Ray includes it as a supplement for, um, completists). Although there’s plenty of sex in the film, the balance is in favor of the erotic – Rollin’s preferred forté – rather than porn. Lahaie, who also worked for Rollin in The Grapes of Death, The Night of the Hunted (1980), and The Runaways (1981), has since gone on to become an author and host of sexuality-themed talk shows in France. Though Lahaie’s role in Fascination has become iconic among cult movie fans, her co-star, Franca Maï, gives the stronger performance. With wicked, seductive eyes that finally reveal a deranged mania in the film’s finale, it is Maï who buries the scythe deeper in my memory. Like Lahaie, the actress spent the following decades exploring other realms of art, as a singer, photographer, novelist, and even underground filmmaker; sadly, she died of cancer this past February. The appropriately-titled Fascination remains one of Rollin’s most popular films: the excellent Rollin fansite bears its name, and Finders Keepers Records has the Lahaie-as-Grim-Reaper poster art gracing its brand new Rollin CD compilation, as well as the limited edition 10″ vinyl soundtrack for the film.

Posted in Theater Caligari | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Fascination (1979)

This Night I’ll Possess Your Corpse (1966)

Zé do Caixão, better known to English-speaking horror fans as Coffin Joe, is the creation of director José Mojica Marins, who began playing the character in At Midnight I’ll Take Your Soul (1963), growing out his fingernails until they resembled twisted claws, wearing a top hat and black cape, and drawing innocent young women to his estate for sadistic experiments. The film was a tremendous hit in its native Brazil, a country with no real film industry to call its own (it’s often cited as Brazil’s first horror film); no doubt its success had something to do with the fact that many states in Brazil banned the film outright. Marins went deep into debt to complete the film, but, emboldened by its reception, began work on a sequel to bear a title even more breathless than its predecessor’s: This Night I’ll Possess Your Corpse (1966). Though still a low-budget endeavor, the sequel was more cinematically ambitious, and, perhaps unsurprisingly, the filming was even more tumultuous. When an actress was asked to deliver a speech with a snake wrapped around her neck, it almost choked her to death until the crew dove into the snake pit to save her. The nude actors inhabiting the set during the hallucinatory Hell sequence were treated to electrical shocks from the wires running through the floor. An unpleasant array of tarantulas were assembled for one notorious scene, and a handful of them escaped to terrorize the neighborhood. Cameraman Antonio Franchencko died during filming – of reasons unrelated to Marins’ methods, one presumes, but surely the tragedy would have only added to the film’s reputation as an unholy production. The Brazilian censors were not pleased with the blasphemous result, but the film’s release insured the immortality of Zé do Caixão. Coffin Joe haunted the pages of his own comic book, and put in cameos in Marins’ other films. He regularly dresses as the character in his daily life, as he did during an appearance at the 2001 Sundance Film Festival, introducing a midnight screening of At Midnight I’ll Take Your Soul with a sinister incantation, delivered in Portuguese.

One of the many tarantulas exploring the bodies of Coffin Joe's sleeping victims.

This Night I’ll Possess Your Corpse is both shocking and charming, sometimes simultaneously. Part of this is due to the film’s age; the print used for Fantoma’s 2001 DVD release looks like it’s been rescued after playing for a few decades straight at a São Paulo moviehouse, and the soundtrack crackles like an early Universal horror film. When Marins appears on the day-lit streets in his mortician’s garb to terrorize a throng of peasants, he looks like some occult superhero: the South American Doctor Strange. When one side of his unibrow lifts as he delivers another booming threat, the effect is more comical than menacing. And the film can’t shake the influences of decades-older B-movies, from Coffin Joe’s inexplicable mad scientist’s laboratory to his defeat at the hands of a lynch mob that chases him into a swamp. On the other hand, it’s plainly evident that Marins is willing to go much further than his genre contemporaries in North America. The viewer is instantly aware that those are real tarantulas crawling all over the semi-clothed bodies of his actresses (in a sadistic bit of lasciviousness, Marins shoots the spiders crawling over the victims’ panty-clad bottoms and up through their nighties via the cleavage). A couple scenes later and the damsels are in distress in a snake pit to rival Raiders of the Lost Ark. It’s also inarguably startling to see a mid-60’s black-and-white horror film with some blunt nudity and gore, even if those moments are fleeting. For no good reason, Coffin Joe pours acid on the face of one beautiful woman, right after his hunchbacked assistant returns to the lab with her body, having accidentally snapped her neck during an off-camera rape. It’s easy to be reminded that this is not a Hollywood horror film, but a low-budget venture with non-professional actors shot in an abandoned synagogue in São Paulo.

Zé do Caixão (José Mojica Marins) tortures his captive women with the help of his hunchbacked assistant.

There was a good reason Marins chose non-professionals. Real actors would complain – rightly – about being subjected to his working conditions. He tried to weed out the cowards during the casting sessions; as Marins biographer André Barcinski writes in the DVD’s liner notes, “candidates for roles in his films were told to lick snakes, handle spiders and even eat cockroaches.” Therefore to take part in a Coffin Joe movie was akin to volunteering for an episode of Fear Factor. A cast of locals were assembled for Marins’ vision of Hell, a dream sequence which arrives two-thirds of the way through the film. Hell is a wintry cavern in which the damned are unclothed and sealed into the ice and rock (heads, limbs, and buttocks extend from the walls, ceiling, and floor), to be poked and prodded by musclemen with pitchforks. Strikingly, this twelve-minute scene is shot in garish full-color, rich with greens, blues, reds, and violets. Marins stumbles through the landscape screaming in terror, finally confronting the Devil (also played by Marins, never more satyr-like), who lounges like Nero with nude, painted women feeding him grapes. This outré vision of the Underworld (with popcorn playing the role of snowfall) remains one of cinema’s most memorable, to take its own place beside Dante’s Inferno (1935) and Jigoku (1960), even with its limited budget and carnival funhouse atmosphere.

The Devil mocks Coffin Joe's atheism during the full-color Hell sequence.

The vivid representation of the afterlife that awaits Coffin Joe plays into the film’s curious thematic conflict, of a Nietzschean atheism vs. a very South American Catholicism. Zé wants to find the ideal woman to bear his child, whom he intends to raise as Nietzsche’s Übermensch. Therefore the experiments on his female captives are intended to find the one among them who is without fear or superstition. His hatred toward religion is only matched by his idealization of children, presumably because of their potential toward being amoral Supermen; when he learns that one of the women he killed was with child, he’s plunged into terror and self-loathing, prompting the Hell nightmare. During the final confrontation with the mob, Zé – drowning in a bog – seems to finally embrace his Creator, but this was merely a dialogue change imposed by the censors. It is crystal clear that Zé do Caixão embodies unrestrained power and egomania. His village lives in fear of him, and though they plot to see him arrested for his crimes, they shrink in his presence. Still, This Night I’ll Possess Your Corpse happily plays into the religious beliefs of its audience – why else would Marins spend so much money and effort on a sequence representing Hell, or focus so much of the film’s final half on Zé’s growing remorse? And there is something ultimately satisfying in seeing the overconfident villain get his comeuppance, even if it’s not quite as horrific as that featured in the climax of At Midnight I’ll Take Your Soul, which saw Coffin Joe seemingly die of fright, eyes bulging out of his skull. Two on-screen deaths can’t keep a good villain down. He’d return in the trilogy’s long-promised, long-delayed conclusion, The Embodiment of Evil, in 2008.

Posted in Theater Caligari | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on This Night I’ll Possess Your Corpse (1966)