The Iron Rose (1973)

In an interview published in the Fall 1973 Cinefantastique, Jean Rollin couldn’t contain his excitement for his latest project: “It won’t be expensive; there will be none of the usual fright effects, no corpses, no blood, just one set, two actors and the night. If it works, it will be explosive.” That film would be La Rose De Fer (The Iron Rose, 1973), and it would be the purest expression yet of the Rollin universe. Two young lovers have a first date in a cemetery, crawling into a crypt to make love. When they emerge, it’s nightfall, and the cemetery has been closed. No matter how far they travel, they can’t find the gates. The graveyard becomes a labyrinth with no exit. In that same interview Rollin was still expressing satisfaction with Requiem for a Vampire (1972), in particular how he’d trimmed the dialogue to such an extent that it was a silent film for long stretches; how he had come to rely more upon images to tell his story; how the requisite sexploitation elements – so necessary to find financing – had been isolated to only a few scenes. The Iron Rose, however, was really the film that Requiem had been leading toward. Unfortunately, it also proved to be something of a dead end, commercially-speaking. His films were never welcomed by the art house crowd; they were ghettoized to the grindhouse market, playing theaters that specialized in sex films. In that respect, something as unique as The Iron Rose had nowhere to go.

Hugues Quester opens the crypt.

It is an erotic film, but not an exploitation film (a distinction many viewers and critics still have trouble making when reviewing anything with a trace of the erotic or sensual). The beautiful Françoise Pascal (Burke & Hare) plays a young woman in a very short schoolgirl’s skirt and a brightly-colored blouse that becomes half-buttoned and increasingly shredded over the course of the film – as though she were perilously traversing a “Barbarella” comic strip. In fantasy sequences, she visits the familiar Rollin beach (so prominently featured in his previous vampire cycle – it has become the world of his subconscious), standing among the sharp black rocks and gray sky, completely nude, striding through the chilly tide and obsessing over the small iron-carved rose of the title. But by Rollin standards, this is a very chaste film that would bring no satisfaction to the raincoat crowd. It was a personal project: an allegory, a fable. It’s a film about death, which lurks always at the edge of our thoughts, no matter how hard we try to push it away; Ernest Becker, author of The Denial of Death, would have embraced it. Pascal, in a mesmerizing performance, begins as an innocent, frightened of the cemetery, certainly wary of crawling into a crypt to satisfy the lusts of her impetuous new boyfriend. By the end of the film she is transformed, unwilling to leave even when the exit finally appears with the dawn. This landscape of the dead has possessed her. She’s given herself over to the allure of morbidity – the meaning behind the poem which her lover (Hugues Quester, credited as Pierre Dupont) recites at a wedding reception in the film’s opening (he recites the poem with solemnity, then gives a frivolous laugh; as my wife put it, he’s a poser).

Quester and Françoise Pascal amongst the dead.

One could argue whether the film is meant to be taken as a genre horror film – she is literally possessed by the spirits of the dead – or whether this is a film about madness, as Pascal gives every sign of losing her marbles. But for Rollin, who concocted the story, I believe the real subject – and the main character – is the cemetery itself. His films recycled the same settings, just as they repeated the same themes, and sometimes the same characters; he was an obsessive fetishist. The Iron Rose gave him the opportunity to explore the world of ornate tombstones and mausoleums that was so prominent in his filmography. It allowed him to explore why this decrepit Gothic landscape should hold such fascination, but even in later films (such as, of course, Fascination) his characters remained preoccupied with death. And there was nothing he loved more than fixing his camera in close-up on a beautiful young woman’s eerily haunted stare.

Pascal possessed.

How wonderful to actually have The Iron Rose available in high definition. The new Blu-Ray release is part of a five-film launch of “The Cinema of Jean Rollin,” a reintroduction of the cult filmmaker to a wider audience (thanks to Redemption’s partnership with Kino International). To class up the films even further, they’re granted Criterion-style spine numbers…which is good, I think, because it encourages viewers to watch more than just one. I don’t think you can really appreciate Rollin until you’ve seen his style both evolve and repeat over multiple films; it becomes clearer what a unique auteur he was, whatever your ultimate opinion of his work. The Iron Rose, inevitably a visually dark film (since it takes place over the course of one night), nonetheless looks stunning, capturing the cracks on every tombstone and each pebble on the cold beach, not to mention the incongruously bright colors of the young lovers’ wardrobe. Restored from an original French-language print, it also looks very film-like, with an appropriate level of grain and some imperfections inherent in the print used – all of this appealing to anyone who’s going to sit down and watch a Jean Rollin film from the early 70’s. In other words, it’s a vast improvement over the previous DVD release; many of Redemption’s old Rollin discs were non-anamorphic, so such an upgrade is a godsend. Extras include interviews with members of the cast, the English dub track, and a strange introduction by the late Rollin. A booklet by Video Watchdog‘s esteemed Tim Lucas accompanies all the releases in the series, which include The Nude Vampire, Shiver of the Vampires, Lips of Blood, and Fascination.

Posted in Theater Caligari | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on The Iron Rose (1973)

Switchblade Sisters (1975)

It’s nice to know that movies like Switchblade Sisters (1975) exist. Because the 1970’s weren’t like this – they ought to have been – although I suspect that director Jack Hill was simply expressing what he felt all drive-in films should be. The result is a film which Quentin Tarantino famously championed, and it’s easy to see Hill’s mark on Tarantino’s style – tough, playful, over-the-top. Hill was of the new generation of film brats who would leave a significant mark on cinema in the 1970’s (Francis Ford Coppola was a classmate of his at UCLA film school); but he never graduated to the Hollywood elite, and made exploitation films until the early 80’s. Notably his filmography includes the Pam Grier vehicles Coffy (1973) and Foxy Brown (1974); I’m a big fan of Spider Baby (1968), a delirious, dark-humored horror film which prefigures The Texas Chainsaw Massacre (1974). Emerging from the Roger Corman school of filmmaking, Hill knew how to take familiar genre clichés and ratchet them up a few notches. His women are loud and brassy, Russ Meyer-style, and frequently violent. Switchblade Sisters (original title: The Jezebels) essentially takes the premise of a 50’s juvenile delinquent picture and launches it forward into the borderline-surreal. I took it as a parody of the genre. Hill, in an interview with Cashiers du Cinemart, says it was intended to be a “futuristic fantasy, Clockwork Orange type of movie,” which, in retrospect, makes sense. It certainly doesn’t take place in the real world, to its eternal credit.

Lace (Robbie Lee) enjoys a moment of vanity and gang pride in the opening credits of "Switchblade Sisters."

The film opens beautifully. In a grimy, Cabrini-Green-style apartment complex, a landlord shakes down a single mother for rent. While her daughter, Lace (Robbie Lee), eavesdrops from the next room, she pleads to the landlord to hold off – she needs the money to feed her children. After caving in and handing over the cash, she says, “And I hope you roast in Hell.” The fat landlord smugly steps into an elevator, but Lace joins him. She licks her lips teasingly. Then more girls cram into the elevator, all, like Lace, dressed in black and looking like bad news; one girl even has an eyepatch. They corner him. When he demands they get out of his way, all draw switchblades. Lace reaches into his coat and pulls out a revolver. “What’s the world coming to, girls?” she says, then: “Get him!” The entire gang of females jump him. One comic book-style wipe later, and they’re strutting confidently down the middle of the street, past a newspaper stand with headlines like “Twelfth Week of Garbage Strike” and “Crackdown on Youth.” When a car honks for them to get out of the street, they draw their blades. But soon that landlord shows up again – his clothes ripped to shreds – and directs the police to arrest the whole gang, known as the Dagger Debs. No matter; they get tossed in prison all the time. They even have enough dirt on the butch-lesbian warden to escape her rape-y advances. They know they’ll be out in no time.

Maggie (Joanne Nail) is introduced to the Silver Daggers by Lace.

But there’s a new element in their routine: Maggie (Joanne Nail), a pretty young woman who proves that she’s tougher than she looks. Quickly earning the gang’s respect, they defend her from the warden, and when she’s released early, she obliges Lace by delivering a love poem to Lace’s boyfriend, Dominic (Asher Brauner) of the Silver Daggers gang. Dominic becomes infatuated with Maggie – so much so that he follows her home and sexually assaults her while her mother’s in the next room. Maggie hasn’t the heart to tell Lace, and when the Debs are out of prison, they’re soon taking Maggie in as one of their own, rechristening themselves the Jezebels, and plotting to team with the Silver Daggers to wrest control of the school from a rival gang led by a prettyboy named Crabs (Chase Newhart). While the gang war escalates, Lace learns of her boyfriend’s infidelity, and sets up Maggie to take a fall. A bloody shootout with Crabs’ gang at a roller rink leads to Dominic’s death, but Lace won’t be satisfied until she can get Maggie to take a bullet.

Chaos at the roller rink: Dominic (Asher Brauner) answers bullets with bullets while Maggie looks on.

All of this is delivered straight-faced. There’s even a scene ripped straight from an Afterschool Special when Lace tells Dominic she’s pregnant, and he, with irritation, asks her to “take care of it.” (That is, it would be from an Afterschool Special, if it weren’t for the fact that Lace is topless throughout the scene.) The melodrama between Lace and Maggie is played to the hilt. It’s the landscape these characters occupy that serves for satire: the faculty is in constant terror of the gangs, and sheepishly requests protection from them; in one scene, Lace steps up and threatens a student who keeps interrupting the teacher. Crabs, who’s been bought off by the teachers to protect the school, hangs posters of his countenance, Big Brother-style, in the hallways and on the streets (“Power Through Progress,” the poster proclaims). His prized amulet, which Maggie is tasked to steal as an initiation rite, is a ridiculous-looking piece of plastic that looks like it came out of a cereal box. But all of it is brought to the level of punchy pop art thanks to Robbie Lee’s campy, sneering performance as Lace, and Jack Hill’s fully-engaged presentation. His aim is pure: make the audience go wild. And that should have happened, except that mismarketing allowed the film to slip between the cracks. No one was quite sure what Switchblade Sisters was, so nobody went. It’s in retrospect that we can appreciate the gritty feminism, the crazed shootouts, the histrionic dialogue, and the cockeyed vision of an American original – drive-in cinema at its best.

Posted in Theater Psychotronic | Tagged , , , , | 2 Comments

It! The Terror from Beyond Space (1958)

Forbidden Planet (1956) was the exception. Most science fiction films of the 50’s were on a shoestring budget, with simple special effects and acres of stiff dialogue delivered by hard-nosed military men and demure female scientists. There were two principal genres: the giant monster, mutated by nuclear experiments, and the exploration of outer space. The latter category would seem, on the surface, the more optimistic, inspired as it was by the burgeoning space race; but many of those movies were strictly downers – like Rocketship X-M (1950), which demonstrated the perils of space travel by killing off its entire cast. When the UFO craze arrived, Hollywood responded with movies like The Thing from Another World (1951), Earth vs. the Flying Saucers (1956), and Unidentified Flying Objects: The True Story of Flying Saucers (1956); extraterrestrial life seemed increasingly mysterious and frightening. It! The Terror from Beyond Space (1958) seemed like just another entry in the alien invasion subgenre, with another slim budget amped-up by some William Castle-style ballyhoo: the poster proclaimed, “$50,000 Guaranteed! by a world-renowned insurance company to the first person who can prove ‘It’ is not on Mars now!” But the grim efficiency of this modest thriller proved to be a major asset. With a high body count and a claustrophobic setting, the film has established a reputation as an early classic of what would come to be a popular genre mash-up, “science fiction horror.”

Two crew members take a spacewalk to access the rocket's lower decks.

Most famously, Dan O’Bannon’s screenplay for Ridley Scott’s Alien (1979) owes an obvious debt to It! The Terror from Beyond Space. Both films share the same basic premise: a crew onboard a spaceship come to the realization that they’ve taken on a stowaway, a lethal alien creature that destructively takes up residence inside the ship, killing them off one-by-one. The strengths of Scott’s film lie in his attention to convincing detail, as well as, of course, the almost unbearable suspense he manages to generate. But a 1950’s B-movie can’t be held to the same standards; science fiction was still a disreputable genre, the domain of pulp racks, and stuff best suited for children. Neither was there any great auteur behind the film; the similar The Thing from Another World was a better movie, but it benefited from producer Howard Hawks’ quality control (the script and acting compensate for its budgetary limitations). No, It! has just one ace in the hole: a crackerjack idea. As the film opens, our protagonist, Col. Carruthers (Marshall Thompson, Fiend Without a Face) is being delivered back to Earth following a disastrous mission on Mars. He’s accused of murdering his crew, of whom he’s the only survivor. The colonel’s story is so vague – not even he is entirely sure what transpired – that it hardly helps his cause. But the audience glimpses a menacing silhouette creeping onto the cargo bay of the rocket just before it departs the planet, and so we can solve the mystery pretty damn quickly. It’s not long before shipmates begin vanishing, and Carruthers, witnessing history repeat itself, insists upon a thorough search of the ship. They discover a hulking, humanoid alien with giant claws, a bat-like face, and ferocious strength. While it digs its way from one deck to the next – vertically up the rocketship – the survivors find themselves with less space to hide. Bullets and grenades are deployed with an alarming casualness, but they do no harm to the creature. Will the solution come before it breaks down that last door?

A confrontation with the creature in a ventilation shaft foreshadows Ridley's Scott's "Alien."

If I were to pinpoint one key to this modest thriller’s success, it would be the hopelessness of the situation. The alien creature is a Superman whose skin can’t be penetrated. Over the film’s 69-minute running time, relentlessly “It” pushes the crew into a corner. An effective little sequence more directly foreshadows Alien when, after they discover a body in a ventilation shaft, one of the men ventures inside and encounters the creature crawling through the tight space. Eventually two of the men take a spacewalk to access the rocket’s lower decks, attempting to circumvent the beast, but instead encountering it in close quarters, as one desperately wards him off with a blowtorch. (Anyone who’s seen Alien should be screaming at the screen to blast the creature out of the airlock.) Most films of this type are slowly-paced – special effects cost money, after all, so best use them sparingly. But once It! gets going, replacing its Wrong Man setup with monster movie horror, the action clips along nicely. It’s a formula that worked so well that Hollywood has yet to let it go. Though I think I know of two Martian rovers that would like to claim their $50,000 check – is that offer still valid?

Posted in Theater Fantastique | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on It! The Terror from Beyond Space (1958)