Sisters (1973)

Sisters

That Brian De Palma is the son of a surgeon – a philandering surgeon, no less, and one who let his son witness his surgeries – doubtless played a role in the development of his stylistic breakthrough Sisters (1973). The film is a psychosexual and Freudian minefield, but De Palma shoves us through it with demented glee. It’s a comedy disguised as a horror film, or a horror film disguised as a drama, or a Hitchcock homage that follows the Master’s ideas to their most absurd ends. It is De Palma adopting the visual language of Hitchcock to advance his voyeuristic storytelling, and now stands out as the director’s maturation into the artist we all know for his meticulous thrillers to come. To seal the connection with Hitch, Bernard Herrmann (North by Northwest, The Man Who Knew Too MuchPsycho, Vertigo) is along for the ride as composer. Sisters also features a virtuoso performance by Margot Kidder, who would move onto another classic horror film, Black Christmas (1974), before enjoying commercial stardom as Lois Lane in Superman (1978). William Finley, who gained a cult following for playing Winslow Leach – the Phantom – in De Palma’s next film, Phantom of the Paradise (1974), had collaborated with the director for many years, but here appears in one of his most significant roles. Sisters also features memorable turns by Charles Durning (The Fury), Jennifer Salt (Hi, Mom!, Brewster McCloud, Play it Again, Sam), and journeyman actor Lisle Wilson (The Incredible Melting Man), who, judging by his performance here, deserved a much bigger career in film.

Phillip (Lisle Wilson) delivers a birthday cake to Danielle (Margot Kidder). Or is it Dominique?

Phillip (Lisle Wilson) delivers a birthday cake to Danielle (Margot Kidder). Or is it Dominique?

Wilson plays Phillip Woode, who, in the opening scene, has stumbled across a blind woman (Kidder) undressing in his locker room. She doesn’t see him, and he can simply watch. It’s a classic De Palma moment of voyeuristic choice, except even in this early a film in his career, he’s already sending it up: it’s quickly revealed that Woode is in a pre-taped segment for a game show called “Peeping Toms,” and contestants must wager whether he will stay and watch the woman undress or act the gentleman and walk away. It’s a moral dilemma commodified. Woode walks, and both contestants lose, having bet for carnal desire. But for being an unwitting participant in the show, Woode wins a gift certificate to an Africa-themed restaurant (he chuckles at the casually racist gesture; he’s African-American), and invites along the actress model who duped him. Her name is Danielle, she’s not really blind, and she’s recently arrived in New York, a French-Canadian. Kidder pulls off the French-Canadian accent with great charm. Her character was written to be Swedish, but she had grown up around French-Canadians, and suggested to her boyfriend De Palma that Danielle have a French accent instead. He acquiesced to the decision; after all, he had written the screenplay for Kidder as a Christmas present. If you weren’t familiar with the actress from her bigger roles to come, it would be easy to believe that Danielle’s voice were her own. During the date, only gradually does Woode become aware of some slightly disturbing developments, such as Danielle arguing heatedly with her unseen twin sister Dominique (Kidder again), or the fact that she is followed wherever she goes by her French-Canadian ex-husband (Finley, looking uncannily like John Waters). Woode loses her ex-husband, and watches Danielle undress without, this time, looking away – he has stepped out of the reality show and into the fantasy, a theme that would continue through films like Body Double (1984). In the morning, on a whim, he decides to buy a birthday cake for the twin sisters. On the way out, he accidentally knocks Danielle’s pills down the sink’s drain. Danielle frantically tries to find them. When he returns with the birthday cake, he finds Dominique in Danielle’s bed – and he’s stabbed with the kitchen knife that he’d brought to slice the cake.

Grace (Jennifer Salt) witnesses the murder of Phillip from the neighboring building, in a dynamic use of split-screen.

Grace (Jennifer Salt) witnesses the murder of Phillip from the neighboring building, in a dynamic use of split-screen.

With De Palma inviting Hitchcock into the discussion, let’s go ahead and talk about Psycho. Lisle Wilson’s Phillip Woode becomes an increasingly sympathetic character in the long stretch before his murder; by the time he decides to buy Danielle and her twin a birthday cake, and even jovially helps the incompetent baker write the words on the frosting, one wonders if Danielle could ever find a more perfect guy. Of course he’s doomed, but that it takes so long for Sisters to finally become a horror film owes a great debt to the structure of Psycho and its notorious use of Janet Leigh. I watched Sisters last Friday night in a 35mm print at the University of Wisconsin-Madison (part of their ongoing De Palma retrospective), so I wasn’t timing anything, but it certainly feels like half the film has elapsed before Woode meets his end. Yet it is in the murder of Woode that De Palma takes the reins from Hitchcock, utilizing a prolonged split screen inspired by its use in Woodstock (1970). The same year that Sisters arrived, another horror film had the same idea: Wicked, Wicked (1973). “MGM introduces a new film experience,” the poster proclaimed, “DUO-VISION. No glasses – all you need are your eyes. Twice the tension! Twice the terror!” But the split screen in Sisters is effective because it’s not a gimmick; it is naturally and logically integrated. It arrives at the precise moment in the film when we need more information – when we switch to the POV of small-time journalist Grace Collier (Salt), who sees Woode’s hand smearing blood on the window from her apartment across the street. Therefore the split screen is a hand-off in the thriller’s relay race; from here on out, we will be following Grace, not Woode. The split screen serves a metaphorical function as well, representing the separated Siamese twins of Danielle and Dominique. But even after Woode’s death, De Palma keeps the split screen running. We follow Grace as she calls the police and escorts them into the building, insisting they act urgently while, on the other half of the screen, Emil Breton (Finley), the “ex-husband,” arrives in the apartment to clean up the crime scene. There’s blood everywhere, so when he does get it all cleaned up before the policemen on one side of the screen can cross to the other half, it’s part of Sisters‘ inherent black comedy. (The film’s parodic overtones become more pronounced as the film goes on, so that this film actually leads organically into the overt spoof Phantom of the Paradise.) On this viewing I was fascinated by how De Palma doesn’t merely settle with split screen as a gimmick. He keeps playing with the images on both halves of the screen. Note how when the detectives arrive at Danielle’s door, he shifts that one camera back and forth to track Danielle’s nervous movements, or how, when she’s applying makeup in the mirror, there is another divide – in the glass, splitting her face symbolically in half.

Grace brings a private detective, Joseph Larch (Charles Durning), to the scene of the crime.

Grace brings a private detective, Joseph Larch (Charles Durning), to the scene of the crime.

Charles Durning’s arrival, as private detective Joseph Larch, is not just the insertion of some comic relief, but represents a general shift in the film’s tone; increasingly, the film becomes both comic and surreal, even while it remains tense and creepy. In the trade-off, reality is left behind. Larch proudly announces his advanced investigative techniques, which involve posing as a window cleaner and infiltrating Danielle’s apartment, where he rifles through her things as Grace, watching from her own apartment window, essentially becomes James Stewart in Rear Window. Larch is in the apartment long enough to discover where the body has likely been hidden (the sofa-bed), as well as a secret file stolen from a mental institution. While Larch pursues the moving truck that’s carrying the furniture away, Grace reads the file and discovers that Danielle was one of the Blanchion Twins, Siamese Twins joined at the spine. But sister Dominique was said to have died during the separation. Now that we have our suspicions confirmed – that this will be a split-personality case along the lines of Norman Bates – De Palma springs a few more surprises upon us, in a delirious and suspenseful final act that sees Grace not just becoming the sinister Dr. Breton’s latest patient, but also a surrogate for the absent Dominique. In a black and white flashback/dream sequence that reflects late 60’s/early 70’s underground movie surrealism, Grace witnesses a grossly exaggerated version of the past unfolding while joined to Danielle’s side. Efficiently for this low-budget film, it allows De Palma to depict the twins without having to use any special effects to double Kidder. But more importantly, it sells the idea that Grace is becoming Dominique, having been fully integrated into the (literal and figurative) madhouse. De Palma would reuse this device in the key climactic flashback of another Hitchcock riff, Obsession (1976), and it would serve a similar symbolic end. But there is something more satisfyingly unhinged about Sisters‘ final act. Dr. Breton, having drugged Grace, leers over the camera, hypnotizing her, and I found myself squirming in my theater seat, wanting to look away. (Finley’s very good here.) The climax deliberately recreates bloody childbirth, entwined bloodstained fingers becoming entwined twin bodies – another doubling, pairing itself with the opening credits images of infants in utero. And the denouement, one of De Palma’s most tidy endings, hits its beats perfectly, as we witness both the lasting results of Dr. Breton’s mental dominance and Detective Larch’s hilariously absurd, never-ending quest for the truth.

Sisters

Posted in Theater Caligari | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Sisters (1973)

Crimes of Passion (1984)

Crimes of Passion

Ken Russell’s major Hollywood foray, Altered States (1980), was a big-budget, FX-driven, mind-bending science fiction fable centered on isolation tank experiments: a 2001 for the New Age set. Though the film made its money back, it ended Russell’s shot at the Hollywood big time. The British director was already a moneymaker back home, where audiences appreciated that they had their own home-grown Fellini, but the enfant terrible (as British obits would later describe him) was not accustomed to compromise or Hollywood politics. He feuded with screenwriter Paddy Chayefsky and banned him from the set, and Russell’s reputation took a hit in the process. He returned to Europe, directing operas and short films. A few years later he was flying out of L.A. having failed to find any new Hollywood projects, and aboard the plane read a screenplay by Barry Sandler (The Duchess and the Dirtwater Fox), a thriller about prostitution, infidelity, and violent sexual obsession. Soon he was flying back to America, agreeing to make Crimes of Passion (1984). Sandler produced, and Roger Corman’s B-movie production company New World Pictures stepped up with a modest budget. It would be Russell’s last American film.

Kathleen Turner as Joanna Crane as China Blue as "Miss Liberty 1984."

Kathleen Turner as Joanna Crane as China Blue as “Miss Liberty 1984.”

The casting of Kathleen Turner (who, in retrospect, was at the height of her powers) was a masterstroke that can be accredited to Sandler. As Russell is quoted in a 1985 interview with Allan Hunter, included in the packaging for Arrow’s lush new Blu-Ray, “I saw Kathleen in Body Heat and The Man with Two Brains. I figured that any actress who could take a custard pie and behave like that on the carpet had to have some range.” Turner’s introduction ranks as one of the most memorable introductions of a character in Russell’s lengthy filmography: seated on a throne in a blue dress, legs spread, lit in red and blue neon from the signs outside the windows behind her, clutching a bouquet, wearing a beauty queen’s tiara and a ribbon with the word LIBERTY, a man’s head between her legs while she gives an acceptance speech: “It is truly an honor to be named Miss Liberty 1984…I will always serve my country and be a shining beacon of hope for nations the world over, spreading the true spirit of freedom and liberty that is America.” We’re only a few minutes into the film, and Russell’s satirical intent is perfectly clear. Crimes of Passion would become an appropriate parting shot from the director – a goodbye to America as only Russell could deliver it. The scene is both exactly what it appears to be and, simultaneously, something quite different. After she gives him a blowjob, he asks her what her name is, and she says China Blue. He asks for her real name, and she just says, “Miss Liberty.” But there is a third, well-hidden persona, whom we will later meet: Joanna Crane, a successful businesswoman for a ladies’ sportswear brand. At night, in a sleazy motel, she will become anyone for fifty bucks – a beauty queen for this man who just broke up with his beauty queen wife, or perhaps a victim for a client who gets off on rape fantasies. Her transformations are used for comic effect. In one scene she steps into the hotel’s doors as Joanna and steps out as China Blue, like Clark Kent changing costumes in a phone booth. Later, when she has a tryst with our protagonist, she changes within seconds into a stewardess uniform, her double entendre-laced flight attendant’s speech all prepared.

Anthony Perkins as manic preacher Peter Shayne.

Anthony Perkins as manic preacher Peter Shayne.

Also billed above the title is Anthony Perkins, seemingly intent on suggesting what an X-rated Psycho would look like. (It could be easily argued that this film is really Ken Russell’s Psycho, particularly in light of Perkins’ final scene, a tongue-in-cheek appropriation of Hitchcock. But Crimes of Passion has a lot on its mind.) Perkins plays the Reverend Peter Shayne, a demented, sweat-slathered, drug-snorting psychopath who harasses streetwalkers while draping himself in pornography. His introduction is watching a stripper in a peep show, the other customers intensely masturbating – in a typical Russell dirty joke, he shows a silver pan beneath each booth for collecting used tissues. Shayne wants to cleanse his soul, and he sees China Blue as a mirror image, someone he must deliver from sin to save himself. But his means of delivery is a silver vibrator lined with razor blades, a detail that seems to come from the world of David Cronenberg, except that it looks absurd and is utilized in the climax in the most broad and cartoonish manner. Shayne has visions of murdering sex workers with the vibrator, but this isn’t a slasher film: these are merely his fantasies – enacted, in one scene, on a blow-up doll – and we don’t really know what he intends until the finale. The 52-year-old Perkins, whose typecast career at this point mainly consisted of playing Norman Bates (Crimes of Passion was made between Psycho II and Psycho III), goes all-in. The role was the most drastic alteration from the original screenplay, since Russell had noticed the American predilection for pastors raving on TV, and believed the antagonist should be a man of the cloth. (A suitable choice, given the Catholic director’s history of films tweaking religious hypocrisy, most notably in The Devils.) But Perkins had as much to do with building the character up, providing his own pornography-covered props and reportedly living the role of Reverend Shayne off-set. In the film, Shayne stalks China Blue, delivering sexualized and profanity-riddled sermons, come-ons and condemnations entwined with confusion. Early in the film she tries to take him on as a client, but finds his fantasies to be too demanding even for her. Memorably, she sorts through his bag of sex toys – my favorite is a lash for flagellation made of red licorice, which China Blue merrily chews – before discovering the silver “Superman” vibrator.

Bobby Grady (John Laughlin) discusses his marriage in group therapy.

Bobby Grady (John Laughlin) discusses his marriage in group therapy.

Amidst all this, of least interest is the audience surrogate, Bobby Grady (John Laughlin, Footloose), who is languishing in a marriage with the frigid Amy (Annie Potts, Ghostbusters). Bobby and Amy’s distressed marriage is rendered unconvincingly, because frankly Russell doesn’t seem all that interested – a shame, then, that their scenes take up so much of the film. Potts isn’t given much of depth to work with, since her character is repulsed by sex, resents her husband, and is pointlessly withering, a manufactured foil, a shrew. But when she’s forced to watch her husband become “The Human Penis” at a bizarre BBQ with friends, her bored and disgusted posture is priceless. This entire scene is Russell’s oddest send-up of suburban life, completely disconnected from authenticity: Americans as written by an extraterrestrial. Which, let’s face it, adds to the film’s outré value. But the most striking satire to intrude upon the Gradys’ married life is whatever commercial or music video that Amy is watching with dead eyes while Bobby fumbles to seduce her. “It’s a Lovely Life,” the shrieking song is called (by the film’s composer, prog-rocker Rick Wakeman of Yes). The random images send up married life and materialism. Newlyweds frolic by a swimming pool. A flower girl (Ken’s daughter Molly Russell) gapes toothlessly at a caged dove. Silverware is thrown into the pool. A skeleton holds the cage. The bride dives into the pool. Doves are placed in little coffins. Cut back to the Gradys, who don’t react to any of this Monty Python surrealism in the slightest. But Russell was capable of subtle surrealism, too, in this very unreal movie. Even Bobby gets a fantastic opening image (the first scene in the film): a straight-on head and shoulders shot as he talks to his therapy group about his sexual hang-ups. Behind him we see the other members of the therapy session, but we have to intuit that it’s a reflection in a mirror, because they’re receded, turned away. Nonetheless, they frame him perfectly. Russell’s eye for composing an arresting image was always impeccable, whatever the critics thought of his frothing content.

"It's a Lovely Life" - Ken Russell's surreal short film-within-a-film.

“It’s a Lovely Life” – Ken Russell’s surreal short film-within-a-film.

And everything in Crimes of Passion is striking to regard, bathed in neon reds and blues and purples and pinks – exactly how you would envision Ken Russell transitioning his aesthetic to the 80’s. His visuals and surrealistic digressions enliven what could otherwise be a very stagy film: Sandler’s screenplay is almost breathlessly verbose, even if it possesses its share of pithy/vulgar one-liners: “I never forget a face,” China Blue says, “especially when I’ve sat on it.” Or: “If you think you’re going to get back into my panties, forget it. There’s one asshole in there already.” Only Turner can deliver this kind of dialogue. And perhaps only Perkins could embody the crazed delirium of Reverend Shayne’s monologues; he reaches a bizarre apex with an impromptu performance of “Get Happy,” an inspiration of Russell’s. The dialogue is so hyper-stylized that it crashes elsewhere, like in the spats between Laughlin and Potts, which are genuinely awful. But Crimes of Passion is a movie that gets off on the outrageous, as though Russell were liberated post-Altered States, exhilarated to let his freak flag fly. The extreme sex scenes, particularly one in which Turner sodomizes a cop with his own night stick, place this film in the company of other erotic thrillers that explored the audience’s curiosity for the seedy or the taboo, like Paul Schrader’s Hardcore (1979), William Friedkin’s Cruising (1980), Brian De Palma’s Dressed to Kill (1980) and particularly Body Double (1984). As with those films, the story’s thrust (pardon the expression) is a straight-laced outsider on an adventure into a world of dangerous sex; in this case, it is Bobby, who owns a home security shop, paid to tail Joanna on suspicion of industrial espionage. He doesn’t find a thief, but he does find China Blue. The formula would become standard for the erotic thriller, perhaps reaching its purest form in Eyes Wide Shut (1999). Compare the final line of this film to that of Kubrick’s. Was Kubrick’s classier erotic adventure inspired by Crimes of Passion? It’s a funny thought, but I don’t doubt that Kubrick would have seen Russell’s film.

China Blue is hired by a wealthy couple for a three-way.

China Blue is hired by a wealthy couple for a three-way.

The film’s theme is perhaps best summed up in a line about sex that Bobby delivers to his wife: “It isn’t a crime to enjoy it, Amy. It’s only a crime to lie about it.” Of all the transgressive sexual acts depicted in the film (admittedly, a bit less shocking these days), the real “crime of passion” is lying: lying to oneself about one’s true desires, lying to others. The Blu-Ray contains nineteen minutes of deleted scenes, much of them exploring the relationships among Joanna/China Blue, Bobby, and Amy. By trimming them and paring the film down, the film homes in on Russell’s and Sandler’s idea of Bobby and Joanna shedding their disguises and uniting as their true selves, their sexuality a major part of that equation. The Perkins subplot could almost be irrelevant, an artificial plot device buried under shameless perversion, if it weren’t for his repeated insistence on revealing “the truth” to China Blue. He maintains that they are the same, a riddle that reaches a visual apotheosis in a climactic gag, but he’s also about stripping down layers – like Bobby, the Reverend Shayne pares down from beauty queen fantasy in a motel tryst to sassy China Blue to the very vulnerable Joanna Crane, who is barely holding it together, whatever her tough attitude and killer lines. But to sell all those layers, to make them believable as they’re shed one at a time, it could only take Kathleen Turner. As usual with a Ken Russell film, it would take a second look and a more indulgent audience to see such a shining performance behind all the walls of outrage and scandal that Russell defiantly offers like a carnival barker. But his garishness has its own beauty, and that makes Crimes of Passion another notable Ken Russell film, as well as a worthy capper to his brief Hollywood career: a portrait of America as a country desperately in need of shedding its neuroses and costumes and Puritan sexual hang-ups.

Crimes of Passion poster

Posted in Theater Smoking Gun | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on Crimes of Passion (1984)

Theatre of Blood (1973)

Theatre of Blood

By the 1970’s, Vincent Price had moved on from Roger Corman’s Edgar Allan Poe pictures to British horror films that leaned toward the camp. The new pattern was firmly established by The Abominable Dr. Phibes (1971), Robert Fuest’s dazzling and bizarre black comedy hit about a disfigured physician seeking revenge for his wife’s death. In the film, Price murders a number of noted British character actors using methods both elaborate and sadistic. The film was followed by Dr. Phibes Rises Again (1972), as well as the almost identically structured Theatre of Blood (1973) and Madhouse (1974). Of the films in this quasi-series, Theatre of Blood is the best. It isn’t as pretty to look at as The Abominable Dr. Phibes (Fuest, who also directed The Final Programme, had an eye for the colorful and surreal), but director Douglas Hickox (Entertaining Mr. Sloane) does lend the proceedings a visual impact and immediacy that some of Price’s other films in this decade lacked. Theatre of Blood also has a secret weapon in co-star Diana Rigg (The Avengers series, On Her Majesty’s Secret Service), whose high standards often kept her away from silly little horror films like this. (Rigg can currently be seen stealing the show on Game of Thrones.) It’s likely that what drew Rigg to the project wasn’t the opportunity to work with Price, who, although beloved, was by now firmly linked to hammy spoofs, having appeared on the Batman TV series, Red Skelton, and The Brady Bunch, in addition to increasingly cheap B-movies like Dr. Goldfoot and the Girl Bombs (1966). No, it was probably the literate script by Anthony Greville-Bell (The Strange Vengeance of Rosalie), which is explicitly a satire on the world of the theater – a world with which Rigg was very familiar.

Vincent Price, as Edward Lionheart, performs Marc Antony's speech from "Julius Caesar": "I come to bury Caesar, not to praise him."

Vincent Price, as Edward Lionheart, performs Marc Antony’s speech from “Julius Caesar”: “I come to bury Caesar, not to praise him.”

The gimmick of Theatre of Blood is that all the murders committed by the vengeful ex-actor Edward Lionheart (Price) are rooted in Shakespeare. This makes the creative slayings a bit more entertaining than in Price’s other films of the period because we are trying to see how he’s going to, for example, turn The Merchant of Venice into something bloody. The backstory comes out gradually, but eventually we learn that Lionheart was an ill-respected actor who believed that his season of performing an exhaustive list of Shakespeare plays would garner the coveted Critics Circle Award for 1970. The members of the Critics Circle, however, have always found Lionheart’s performances to be old-fashioned and scenery chewing. When he fails to win the award, Lionheart crashes a private gathering of the critics, steals the award, excoriates them, delivers a bit of Hamlet’s “To Be or Not to Be” soliloquy, and jumps off the balcony and into the Thames. It’s a tour de force scene for Price, who must have related to Lionheart’s banishment from critical praise. In a funny moment late in the film, Price says of a ham sandwich: “My reputation.” Rather than drowning in the Thames, Lionheart is rescued by a band of mentally unbalanced alcoholic vagabonds (“meths drinkers,” as the credits call them), whom he accepts as his disciples – the groupies he never had in his theatrical career. He’s also reunited with his daughter, Edwina (Rigg), who witnessed his leap into the Thames. Disguising herself as a mustachioed (and possibly gay) hippie, Edwina aids her father in punishing the critics who refused to give him the Critics Circle Award.

Members of the Critics Circle gather to mourn one of Lionheart's victims.

Members of the Critics Circle gather to mourn one of Lionheart’s victims.

One of the critics, Peregrine Devlin (Ian Hendry, Get Carter), is the first to notice the Shakespearean pattern to the deaths of members of the circle: first George Maxwell (Michael Hordern, Demons of the Mind) is stabbed by a mob of homeless he’s trying to evict from his tenement, a “Julius Caesar starring Edward Lionheart” poster on the wall; then, at Maxwell’s funeral, the wonderfully named Hector Snipe (Dennis Price, Twins of Evil) arrives as a bloody corpse dragged behind a horse, in the manner of Hector in Troilus and Cressida. Looking back at the infamous season of Shakespeare performed by Lionheart, Devlin sees that these were the first two plays performed, with many more to follow (conveniently, there’s one play for each critic). This turns Theatre of Blood into a macabre game in which the audience can participate, reaching back into their knowledge of Shakespeare. But some of the choices are a little obscure, particularly Cymbeline, a play which is seldom performed these days, and which seems to be here for the sole reason that its plot includes a decapitation. (It seems odd that one of Shakespeare’s bloodiest plays, Macbeth, isn’t included – but perhaps stabbing someone while they sleep just isn’t cinematically interesting.) The murders not only recreate Lionheart’s final season as an actor, but also provide Price his own repertoire of the Bard, giving him the opportunity to perform key scenes from the likes of Othello, Richard III, Titus Andronicus, and King Lear, sometimes in elaborate makeup and costumes. Dead to the world, plotting from beneath the stage of an abandoned theater (which, we should remember, is called “Hell” in theatrical parlance), the wronged Lionheart pores over his personal scrapbook and takes comfort in the love of his daughter and the blind adoration of his deranged, drunken audience. Frequently he walks the boards recreating some of his great roles, his daughter joining him. Perhaps this film comes closer to the Phantom of the Opera inspiration behind Dr. Phibes, but it’s also an unusual horror film in the deep levels of its meta-theatrics. At one point, Edwina lures to the stage Trevor Dickman (Harry Andrews, Moby Dick) – “It’s living theater, with audience participation” – encouraging him to perform lines from The Merchant of Venice. She casually tells him, “We’ve made several alterations to the script and one rather large cut.” This involves Edward Lionheart actually taking his “pound of flesh” from Dickman, removing his still-steaming heart. When Lionheart places the organ on a scale, he notes with dismay that it’s two ounces over a pound – and cuts it down some more, like a butcher in a butcher shop. Later when Devlin examines the victim, he says, “It’s Lionheart all right. Only he would have the temerity to rewrite Shakespeare.”

Edwina Lionheart (Diana Rigg) lures an unsuspecting Devlin (Ian Hendry) into her father's clutches.

Edwina Lionheart (Diana Rigg) lures an unsuspecting Devlin (Ian Hendry) into her father’s clutches.

R-rated in the States (where it was distributed by United Artists), Theatre of Blood has a nasty edge to its black comedy, notably in the gross-out showstopper where Lionheart force-feeds one critic (Robert Morley, Around the World in 80 Days) his beloved poodles, baked in a pie. As a dog lover, this scene is pretty hard for me to watch, even though it’s done in the most outrageous manner possible: as a mock game show hosted by Price called “This is Your Dish.” (The scene is inspired by Titus Andronicus.) Although the screenplay could stand to distinguish its many victims a little further – many of them are just stuffy critics – the cast is loaded with ringers; I haven’t mentioned that former bombshell Diana Dors (Blonde Sinner) has a small role as an unwitting Desdemona, nor that the secretary to the Critics Circle is played by Hammer ingenue Madeline Smith (The Vampire Lovers, Frankenstein and the Monster From Hell). The cast also includes Coral Browne (Auntie Mame), who would fall in love with Price during filming; never mind that their big scene together involves him electrocuting her. They married in 1974, and remained together. But Price and Rigg own the proceedings, somehow meeting each other halfway. Rigg camps it up a bit – particularly when in disguise – and Price reaches rare emotional depths, climaxing in a recreation of the tragic ending of King Lear, where Edward Lionheart becomes Lear, and Edwina his beloved daughter Cordelia. It’s clever stuff.

Theatre of Blood is newly available on Blu-Ray from Twilight Time.

Theatre of Blood poster

 

Posted in Theater Caligari | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Theatre of Blood (1973)