100 Essential Films of the Fantastic (1-25)

A Trip to the Moon

First off, this list is entirely personal. You will have 100 of your own. The intention is to draw a broad outline of fantasy films since the start of cinema in hopes that the reader might find some helpful recommendations. It’s an admittedly ludicrous endeavor to define 100 of the most essential of anything, which is why this is just “100 Essential Films of the Fantastic,” not the most essential. To pare this last down to 100, I found myself discarding many acknowledged classics, and holding tight to others for the sake of variety or my own passion for them.

To define what I mean by “Films of the Fantastic”…

Science fiction films are automatically considered eligible since they take place in the realm of “what if.” Horror films are eligible only if they contain at least one element of the fantastic. For example, John Carpenter’s Halloween (1978) might be considered due to the last scene in the film, which implies the supernatural, though Halloween III (1982), fitting the above criteria more fully, makes a more interesting and perhaps more worthy candidate for this list. I found myself removing some major genre films from the list for the simple reason that the fantasy elements were too fleeting, or perhaps questionable (such as Jack Clayton’s The Innocents).

The era is taken into consideration. Today big-budget fantasy films are common. Although one might argue that Chandu the Magician (1932) is not as good a film as the latest multi-million-dollar superhero movie, it’s an exemplar B-movie of its era and uncommon in many ways; today FX-laden pulp movies are so everyday that, for the purposes of this list, I have the luxury to be picky. My intent is not to compare films from different eras but to celebrate those fantasy films which are outstanding for their time.

I could easily name 100 other films instead of these, but – as is the nature of these things – for the moment these are the ones I favored. They’re listed in chronological order, not from best to worst. Links are provided if I’ve reviewed the film for this site. I will post these in four installments; here is the first, taking us from 1902 to 1951:

 01 Conquest of the Pole #1 A Trip to the Moon/Conquest of the Pole (1902/1912) D: Georges Méliès

A double feature of shorts from the pioneer of special effects. Le voyage dans la lune (1902) provides arguably the most iconic image in fantasy cinema. À la conquête du pôle (1912) continues the exploration theme, and features an impressive encounter with a frost giant.

 02 Inferno  #2 L’Inferno (1911) D: Giuseppe de Liguoro

Spectacular, and painstakingly literal, adaptation of Dante’s Inferno as Virgil guides the poet through one gorgeous, extras-torturing set after another. Available on DVD with a Tangerine Dream soundtrack.

 03 Cabinet of Dr Caligari #3 The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari (1920) D: Robert Wiene

German Expressionist cinema at its most nightmarish, this tale told by a madman features funhouse sets of extreme angles and painted shadows, along with influential makeup and costume design.

 04 Haxan #4 Haxan: Witchcraft Through the Ages (1922) D: Benjamin Christensen

An impassioned essay film about the dangers of religious fundamentalism, Haxan also happens to give the viewer one spellbinding occult image after another, with plenty of black humor and outrageousness.

 05 Nosferatu #5 Nosferatu, a Symphony of Horror (1922) D: F.W. Murnau

Murnau was a master of silent cinema, and his unauthorized adaptation of Dracula, with images that sear the brain, delivered one of the defining cinema monsters in Max Schreck’s starch-stiff vampire. Remade by Werner Herzog in 1979.

 06 Thief of Bagdad #6 The Thief of Bagdad (1924) D: Raoul Walsh

Douglas Fairbanks plays the freewheeling thief in this mega-budget spectacle of early Hollywood. The sets by William Cameron Menzies lend a storybook exaggeration to a tale that features a winged horse, a giant spider, a flying carpet, and breathtaking stunts.

 07 Adventures of Prince Achmed #7 The Adventures of Prince Achmed (1926) D: Lotte Reiniger

An Arabian Nights tale often cited as the earliest surviving animated feature film, Reiniger’s innovative film uses shadow-puppet-style cut-outs of intricate design to enact an elaborate fantasy romance.

 08 Faust  #8 Faust (1926) D: F.W. Murnau

The definitive adaptation of the Faust story is one of Murnau’s greatest achievements. Wickedly funny and tremendously entertaining, it’s a Gothic phantasmagoria of German Expressionism.

 09 Metropolis  #9 Metropolis (1927) D: Fritz Lang

An epic science fiction parable from another German master, Lang’s seminal work features a production design that seamlessly bridges the gap between Biblical history and a dystopian future.

 10 Dracula  #10 Dracula (1931) D: Tod Browning

Though the Bela Lugosi/Tod Browning Dracula, an adaptation of a stage play of Bram Stoker’s work, is often criticized for being too talky and lacking in excitement or visual style, it is nonetheless a truly eerie work, and of course influential. The  introduction to Lugosi’s Count, in a cobwebbed crypt, is indelible.

 11 Chandu the Magician  #11 Chandu the Magician (1932) D: William Cameron Menzies, Marcel Varnel

If only all pulp serials and B-movies of the 30’s looked like this. William Cameron Menzies knew how to film comic book dreams. Lugosi embraces one of his best film roles as the villainous Roxor, and Edmund Lowe plays the illusionist hero Chandu.

 12 Island of Lost Souls  #12 Island of Lost Souls (1932) D: Erle C. Kenton

One of the creepiest horror films of the 30’s (rivaled only by Tod Browning’s Freaks), this adaptation of H.G. Wells’ The Island of Dr. Moreau features standout performances by Charles Laughton as Moreau, Kathleen Burke as the Panther Woman, and Bela Lugosi as the Sayer of the Law.

 13 King Kong  #13 King Kong (1933) D: Ernest B. Schoedsack

One of the greatest fantasy films of all time, Merian C. Cooper, Ernest B. Schoedsack, and Willis O’Brien breathlessly take us from a lost island overrun by dinosaurs to the summit of the Empire State Building in the tight grip of the 8th Wonder of the World.

 14 Bride of Frankenstein  #14 The Bride of Frankenstein (1935) D: James Whale

Whale’s counterintuitive follow-up to his smash hit Frankenstein (1931) features a number of odd but poetic touches, including Dr. Pretorius’ collection of costumed homunculi in jars, and Elsa Lanchester as both the Bride and Mary Shelley herself.

 15 Mad Love  #15 Mad Love (1935) D: Karl Freund

Freund, who directed The Mummy (1932), combines German Expressionism and pulp drama with this adaptation of The Hands of Orlac. Peter Lorre, as a demented surgeon, is at his finest in this dream-like film.

 16 Vassilisa the Beautiful  #16 Vassilisa the Beautiful (1939) D: Alexander Rou

This influential Russian fantasy was popular in its homeland during WWII, but seldom seen in the West. It’s a classic Russian fairy tale with Baba Yaga, a three-headed dragon, and a memorably surreal production design.

 17 Wizard of Oz  #17 The Wizard of Oz (1939) D: Victor Fleming

Having recently rewatched this, I was struck at what a truly strange film it is to have become such a highly-regarded classic – but there’s no arguing its qualities. Dark Side of the Moon is optional.

 18 Fantasia  #18 Fantasia (1940) D: Norman Ferguson and others

A gamble (which didn’t exactly pay off), this film – extolling classical music – is long, ambitious, and occasionally pretentious. It’s also beautiful to behold and remains the high watermark of cel animation. Walt’s interest in his animated feature films declined after Fantasia; the films began to play it safe, which is a shame.

 19 Thief of Bagdad  #19 The Thief of Bagdad (1940) D: Ludwig Berger, Michael Powell, Tim Whelan

A remake (of sorts) of the 1924 Thief of Bagdad, which also makes this list, this British take on Arabian Nights fantasy features a different plot and a very different lead in the young Sabu. The film was a strong influence on Ray Harryhausen as well as Disney’s Aladdin (1992).

 20 The Wolf Man  #20 The Wolf Man (1941) D: George Waggner

Universal’s horror line got a much-needed shot (or bite?) in the arm with The Wolf Man, which made Lon Chaney Jr. a star, and also offered a token role to the studio’s former leading man, Bela Lugosi. The fog-shrouded woods, the gypsy camp, and the existential angst of Chaney all add up to one of horror’s great films.

 21 Cat People  #21 Cat People (1942) D: Jacques Tourneur

A Hollywood anomaly, the string of horror films by producer/writer Val Lewton for RKO counter-programmed against Universal’s monster mashes with films that emphasized atmospherics, dread, and guilt. The sophisticated and adult Cat People might be the best, though all are essential viewing.

 22 Beauty and the Beast  #22 Beauty and the Beast (1946) D: Jean Cocteau

Cocteau combines the visuals of a surrealist (candle-holders are human arms extending from the castle walls) with the spare precision of a modern poet. A fairy tale with teeth.

 23 A Matter of Life and Death  #23 A Matter of Life and Death (1946) D: Michael Powell, Emeric Pressburger

One of my “desert island films,” a Powell & Pressburger classic featuring charming performances by David Niven and Kim Hunter, trying to reconnect through the divide of the afterlife. In a reverse Wizard of Oz, Earth is presented in glorious color, and a monolithic Heaven is in stark black-and-white (because of course it is).

 24 Orpheus  #24 Orpheus (1950) D: Jean Cocteau

Cocteau’s masterwork, part of a trilogy filled out by the more abstract films The Blood of a Poet (1932) and The Testament of Orpheus (1960), Orpheus retells the Greek myth in a contemporary setting (cars and radios play a key role). The Underworld can be accessed by stepping through a mirror in the manner of Alice through the Looking-Glass.

 25 Tales of Hoffman  #25 The Tales of Hoffman (1951) D: Michael Powell, Emeric Pressburger

Powell & Pressburger decided to adapt a famous opera as an opera, with only the slightest framing device (we see the theatergoers arriving, at intermission, etc.). Basically an extended version of the musical sequence of The Red Shoes (1948), the stage and the fantastic reality are seamlessly blended, evoking many stunning visual setpieces.

Posted in Theater Fantastique | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 7 Comments

The Fabulous Baron Munchausen (1961)

Fabulous Baron Munchausen
Baron Prášil (1961), or The Fabulous Baron Munchausen, was the fourth feature film by Czech animator/director Karel Zeman, following his dazzling The Fabulous World of Jules Verne (Vynález zkázy, 1958) and building upon its intricate and delightful production design. Here we see his unique style approaching perfection. Certainly the subject matter is ideal for his surrealistic approach. The tall-tale exploits of Baron Munchausen (in reality, German nobleman Hieronymus Carl Friedrich Baron von Münchhausen) gained wide popularity with the 18th century books, by Rudolf Erich Raspe and Gottfried August Bürger, purporting to tell of the Baron’s adventures across the world, under the sea, and on the Moon. A later volume illustrated by Gustave Doré has become iconic of both the great illustrator’s work and the Baron himself. The antiquated fantasy world of Munchausen is a natural landscape for Zeman, whose films combine live action with a variety of styles of animation, most prominently paper cut-outs. Truly, Zeman’s encounter with the Baron was inevitable: where The Fabulous World of Jules Verne strove to replicate the 19th century illustrations of Verne novels, The Fabulous Baron Munchausen would apply the same techniques to bring to life the Munchausen of Doré.

Baron Munchausen returns from the Moon on a ship borne by winged horses.

Baron Munchausen returns from the Moon on a ship borne by winged horses.

The opening is sublime. Following a primal thunderstorm, Zeman’s camera tracks footprints through the sand while Zdenek Liska’s score thumps along like an invisible traveler. We stop to scrutinize a toad squatting upon a toppled jug in a pool of water – another clue of human civilization – before Zeman pans up to stop-motion butterflies fluttering through the air. He pans up again: a man on a Wright Brothers-style aircraft glides past. Up again: a flock of stop-motion geese. Further up, while Liska’s strings rise dramatically: a sputtering biplane. Further up: eagles, and then jet airplanes. Finally, breathlessly, we are in outer space, and a buzzing rocket zips by, leaving Earth’s orbit for the Moon. Then we’re on the Moon’s surface, tracking more footprints in the lunar dust. An astronaut leaves his spacecraft, and he looks down. Those aren’t his footprints…whose are they? (Consider that this inspired opening anticipates by years not just Ray Harryhausen’s First Men in the Moon, but the eons-spanning jumpcut of 2001: A Space Odyssey.) The astronaut follows the path over a hill, and discovers a phonograph. He puts a needle to the record, and it plays. Walking a little further, he discovers the rocket from Verne’s 1865 novel From the Earth to the Moon; we know this, because the plaque on the rocket gives the title and year – and also because its three pilots are standing only a few yards away to greet him. Then out comes Cyrano de Bergerac (who wrote a 17th century novel about his trip to the Moon). Of course, Baron Munchausen himself is there (played by Milos Kopecký), who mistakes the spacesuited astronaut as a creature native to the Moon. He offers to show the Moon Man, whose real name is Tony (Rudolf Jelínek), what the Earth is like – or at least the Earth as the Baron knows it. And so they embark on a galleon pulled by winged horses. The Baron first takes Tony to see the Turks, because he thinks all the crescent moons will remind him of home.

An unusual mise-en-scène, with a chase scene framed by the symbolic images of the Moon and a rose.

An ornate mise-en-scène, with a chase scene framed by the symbolic images of the Moon and a rose.

At the palace of the Great Sultan, Tony falls for the Princess Bianca (Jana Brejchová), who flees with them while the Sultan sends his army in pursuit. We follow the Baron’s new adventures as he finds himself in the midst of a naval battle, in the belly of a giant fish, in the claws of a great bird, and finally inside a besieged castle, where he takes his famous cannonball ride. But this is a film in which the details are more important than the plot. Telling a fantasy (of “lies”) rather than a science fiction story of Verne’s, Zeman is free to unleash his animator’s imagination on the screen. The visual gags come at a breathless pace. When Tony approaches the Sultan’s throne, spears come thrusting forward; only on experimentation does he discover that the spears are triggered by a Rube Goldberg-style mechanism just under the throne (Zeman quickly pans down to reveal the machine-works below, seamlessly blending live action with animation). After some fighting that’s just as much about chess as it is swordplay, the Baron and Tony flee to a sealed chamber and throw themselves against the doors, which resist all their efforts; then Bianca casually reveals that they’re sliding doors, which happen to be unlocked. On and on it goes, full of visual invention, but driven by a central comedic premise: that the Baron always misinterprets and yet, somehow, is always proven to be true. Zeman shoots only a few scenes in color, preferring to tint his black-and-white in the style of silent cinema; but he frequently experiments, so that many shots look as though they’ve been dipped in various dyes. Nothing is ever visually dull, such as when the Baron, Tony, and the Princess are chased out of the Turkish city not just by the Turks, but by a billowing red cloud that stains the orange-tinted backdrop. Eventually, while the Baron narrates, the chase scene is poetically framed by the image of a rose touching the Moon – symbolic, as the Baron explains, of the Princess falling under the spell of Tony’s tales of the future. In Zeman’s intriguing retelling of the Munchausen story, the Baron finds Tony to be a rival fabulist: one whose tales of rocketships just happen to be true. (The Baron is dismayed that the Princess finds these tales of modern technology so enchanting, rather than the Baron’s fantasies. In one of the film’s most clever sequences, we see the Baron adrift on a raft with the Princess, surrounded by sea serpents and flying beasts – all things that are part of the Baron’s world and no one else’s.) Only at the end of the story does Tony arrive at a strategy worthy of the Baron: to use gunpowder to propel them back to the Moon inside a flying castle. The Baron is proud of such an unreasonable plan.

The Baron (Milos Kopecký) finds himself in the belly of a giant fish.

The Baron (Milos Kopecký) finds himself in the belly of a giant fish.

The modern viewer watching this film will inevitably be reminded of Terry Gilliam, and not just because he directed the most well-known Munchausen film, The Adventures of Baron Munchausen (1988). Zeman’s style of animating cut-outs, as well as optically matting live action against drawings, bears an uncanny resemblance to the Gilliam animations of Monty Python’s Flying Circus some eight years later – as though what we know of the director fermented here, in the work of Karel Zeman. In particular, the extended sequence in the belly of the fish – in which the Baron and the Princess take refuge in the cabin of a swallowed ship – seems to have directly influenced the later film adaptation. In Ian Christie’s book Gilliam on Gilliam (1999), the former Python acknowledges the influence: “I think it was seeing a picture from Karel Zeman’s Munchausen in a Nation Film Theatre programme that got me excited. It seemed to be a combination of live action with drawn backgrounds, and somewhere along the line I got to see the film.” Gilliam also notes that he then saw the (interesting, but inferior) 1943 Münchhausen made in Germany under the Nazi regime. (The owner of the remake rights for this film filed a lawsuit during the production of Gilliam’s film, despite the fact that the books were in the public domain; the suit was later dropped.) “I didn’t like the German version particularly, but Munchausen was in the air. I read the book and in many ways it was the Doré illustrations that seduced me. This is what happened with Don Quixote* as well – it seems to be my mission in life to make Doré come alive.” Clearly he and Zeman were kindred spirits. In both films is the spirit of Doré’s illustrations, as well as a great deal of the mischievous Baron himself.

Fabulous-Baron-Munchausen-Poster

*See 2002’s documentary Lost in La Mancha for more on that Don Quixote business…

 

Posted in Theater Fantastique | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on The Fabulous Baron Munchausen (1961)

The Fabulous World of Jules Verne (1958)

The Fabulous World of Jules Verne

Following his rather remarkable children’s educational film Journey to the Beginning of Time (Cesta do pravěku, 1955), Czech animator-turned-director Karel Zeman tripled his ambition for a loving tribute to the Voyages Extraordinaires novels of Jules Verne with Vynález zkázy (An Invention for Destruction, 1958). In 1961 the film was belatedly released in the U.S. as The Fabulous World of Jules Verne, by which time the film had won numerous awards around the world, including the International Film Festival’s Grand Prix at the Brussels World’s Fair. (I will refer to the film by its common English-language title for the sake of simplicity.) The film has remained undeservedly obscure in the U.S., but those with a region-free DVD player can seek out the 2012 DVD released by the Karel Zeman Museum (uncut and with English subtitles), readily available online. I recently did so after acquiring a Fabulous World of Jules Verne U.S. release poster at the Horrorbles shop in Burwyn, Illinois; I knew what the film was, but felt that I should finally get around to watching it (now that I have the poster framed and hanging behind a model Nautilus!). After watching the DVD, I kicked myself for delaying so long. Zeman’s film is a revelation. To say it has aged well is an understatement. Rather, it seems to exist outside of time; I would defy someone to watch it and guess the year it was made, or the decade. This is largely because Zeman’s multitude of special effects techniques have one goal in mind, which is to create a film that looks exactly like the steel engravings of first-edition Jules Verne novels of the late 19th century. (Watching the film, I was anachronistically reminded of Canadian filmmaker Guy Maddin’s oeuvre recreating the texture of silent films and early talkies, but most of all – believe it or not – Robert Rodriguez’s Sin City, in service to the ink-drenched illustrations of Frank Miller.) Consider that Zeman’s film followed the release of Disney’s 20,000 Leagues Under the Sea (1954), which is just about the best Verne adaptation one can hope to receive. The Disney film may condense the novel, but it’s nonetheless very faithful, with a perfect and charming cast, and rendering Verne’s proto-steampunk world with realism in big-budget, Technicolor Cinemascope; it’s simply one of the greatest fantasy films ever made. Zeman, four years later, gave the world a different Verne tribute: one that eschews realism. If Walt Disney delivered a believable Verne world, Zeman’s “fabulous” world is intentionally two-dimensional, black-and-white, borderline surreal. He just wants to see those Victorian-era illustrations move. So he animates them in miniature, builds full-scale sets flat and painted to resemble pen-and-ink drawings, shoots through aquarium glass. He places his actors inside this collage; and, when he has to, he replaces them with cut-outs or puppets. Anything to achieve the look of those illustrations. Reality has no place here.

A flipper-propelled submarine conducts an undersea search.

A flipper-propelled submarine conducts an undersea search.

The plot only briefly touches on Verne’s Twenty Thousand Leagues Under the Sea, giving us a few highlights from that book. It actually adapts a deeper cut, seldom reprinted, the 1896 novel Facing the Flag. (Verne wrote a lot of novels.) The story concerns Professor Roch (Arnost Navrátil), who discovers a means to unlock great power, but when he’s kidnapped by the sinister Count d’Artigas (Miroslav Holub) – who rams and pillages ships using his Nautilus-like submarine – his discovery is used to built a “Supergun,” a mammoth cannon which can sink the ships of any navy. The Count keeps the professor at work on an island with a lagoon in its center and a smoking volcano. He also imprisons our hero, Simon Hart (Lubor Tokos), and the beautiful Jana (Jana Zatloukalová), whose ship was wrecked by the pirate. The somewhat generic pulp-adventure plotting does offer relevant parallels to the corruption of human ingenuity with the development of atomic weapons, but message aside, the story is really just an excuse for Zeman to apply as many exotic Verne visuals as possible. He begins the film with Simon Hart observing a submarine from the deck of a steamship, and casting his gaze upward to see a man in a pedal-operated flying machine. Later, we will see underwater bicycles used by the Count’s men for their oceanic expeditions; the professor’s towering industrial factory; a large robotic arm that delicately hands the Count’s henchman a pen; the Count’s castle perched on a high crag in the island; a miniature submarine that propels itself with flippers; and other assorted wonders.

Simon Hart (Lubor Tokos) is shown a flying machine in the Count's island lair.

Simon Hart (Lubor Tokos) is shown a flying machine in the Count’s island lair.

These come to us courtesy stop-motion animation, cutout animation (in the style of a Terry Gilliam cartoon), models, forced perspective, trick sets, live action location photography, and optically matting any variety of the above. In fact, Zeman’s favored technique seems to be getting at least two or three layers of effects in the same frame, overwhelming the viewer visually to increase the challenge of determining just how all this was accomplished – and, of course, making the effect all the more convincing. Convincing, that is, of 19th century illustrations come magically to life. Horizontal lines stretch across the skies, and the rays of the sun are diagonal lines extending out of the heavens. Costumes are decorated in black stripes to further the illusion that the actors are part of the drawing. The seas are wavy lines projected onto the surface of water. (I may have that detail wrong. That’s what it looks like.) The cumulative effect is that everything you see was made from pen and ink, but now it moves. When Zeman was a child reading Jules Verne, those illustrations would have meant everything – amidst pages and pages of words, a tantalizing porthole view of the world Verne is describing. Zeman’s film indulges his younger self by letting us pass through that porthole, to swim with him among the fantastic.

The Fabulous World of Jules Verne

Posted in Theater Fantastique | Tagged , , , , , , | 2 Comments