Valentino (1977)

Valentino

Well, now Ken Russell had gone too far. It was one thing to cast Roger Daltrey as a rock star/sex-god incarnation of Franz Liszt in his ultimate nutzoid composer bio, Lisztomania (1975), a film that also featured Ringo Starr as the Pope. For his next project he would make the ultimate transgression: he’d sully the virgin name of Old Hollywood. Mind you, another controversial filmmaker named Ken (Anger) had done this already with his legendary celebrity-gossip book Hollywood Babylon (first published in France in 1959, and in the U.S. in 1965). And there was always a Hollywood tabloid press eager to expose the sins of the stars. But Russell was a British filmmaker targeting not just Hollywood but America. Valentino (1977), his treatment of the short and tumultuous life of silent-film sex symbol Rudolph Valentino, depicts an Italian immigrant whose portrayals of seductive foreigners with lithe bodies, greased hair, and plenty of talcum powder, left women swooning and men accusing the star of being suspiciously effeminate, a “pink powder-puff.” Russell’s idea of Valentino is a man who goes to such lengths defending his masculinity and his American patriotism that it ultimately kills him. The film is also chock full of MAD Magazine-style screaming caricatures, lunging at the camera with exaggerated period slang in costumes (by the director’s wife, Shirley Ann Russell) that are both elegant and surreal, in turns. Predictably, American critics did not embrace Valentino. Russell, almost as if by apology, would make his next film in America (Valentino was shot at Elstree Studios in England), but his attempt at a big-studio populist genre movie, the FX-heavy Altered States (1980), would prove a disastrous personal experience for the director, and effectively sealed the door to Hollywood’s golden gates. He’d remain an outsider filmmaker for the rest of his career, his large-scale spectacles behind him.

Natasha Rambova (Michelle Phillips) conducts some fortune-telling for her co-star Rudolph Valentino (Rudolf Nureyev) on the set of "The Sheik."

Natasha Rambova (Michelle Phillips) conducts some fortune-telling for her co-star Rudolph Valentino (Rudolf Nureyev) on the set of “The Sheik.”

Russell’s first controversial decision was to cast a Russian dancer as an Italian movie star. Rudolf Nureyev was a noted ballet dancer who famously defected from the Soviet Union in 1961 (and, sadly, would later contract AIDS, passing away in 1993). He certainly looks like Valentino, and is given the opportunity to demonstrate his primary talent in a handful of well-choreographed dance scenes: Valentino, like Nureyev, was a dancer before he was an actor. Nureyev’s Italian accent comes and goes from one line to the next, and as for his emoting, sometimes he seems to be performing to the balcony; though Russell encourages such performances, he typically hires such actors of such caliber (Glenda Jackson, Oliver Reed, and so on) that, at least in his best films, a happy medium is found between authenticity and excess. Seeing as the entire film rides on Nureyev’s performance, Valentino stumbles. He simply doesn’t draw us into Valentino’s inner world, so the film leaves one cold. (One could argue that his acting method of expressing himself through his body is a tribute to the techniques of silent film stars. But I wouldn’t go that far. Overacting is overacting.) Russell doesn’t stop there; he also cast Michelle Phillips, she of The Mamas and the Papas, as Natasha Rambova, Valentino’s co-star, wife, fortune teller, and career counselor. This was not Phillips’ first acting role: she had a significant role in John Milius’s Dillinger (1973), and a few smaller roles in film and TV before embodying the most important woman in Valentino’s life. She sells it, rolling with every wild tonal shift – first charming, wise, and seductive, and in later scenes gazing into crystal balls and giving herself over to raving delirium. For Phillips, it was just the start of a long and fruitful acting career. Other players include the great Leslie Caron (Gigi, An American in Paris) as the actress/writer/film producer Alla Nazimova; Seymour Cassel (Faces, Rushmore), wonderful here as Valentino’s late career manager George Ullman; and Carol Kane (The Last Detail), Peter Vaughan (Straw Dogs, Brazil), and John Ratzenberger (of Cheers and just about every Pixar movie).

Natasha Rambova at Valentino's funeral.

Natasha Rambova at Valentino’s funeral.

Russell attempts to circumvent the usual biopic pitfalls by applying a framing device: Valentino’s funeral, where crazed fans storm the funeral home while the desperate staff tries to board up the windows with coffin lids. As the people in Valentino’s life arrive to pay their respects, Russell treats us to a This is Your Life, Rudolph Valentino, and we see the different phases of the actor’s career from the perspective of those who knew him (primarily, his women). But though it’s an admirable effort, this storytelling technique doesn’t really solve the essential problem of the biopic: we’re still privy to the ups and downs of his life with little narrative momentum. The first stretch of the film is pretty dire: lumpy, confusing, and off-putting. One particularly excruciating scene involving a celebrity named “Fatty” (Arbuckle, one presumes), who tries to humiliate Valentino with joy buzzers and braying laughter. But the film improves as it goes along, and sparks to life with some imaginative scenes that should be bookmarked for any Russell clip reel. First among these is a beautifully cinematic sequence in which Valentino’s initiation of a love affair & business commitment with Rambova takes place on the outdoor desert set of The Sheik, the actors in their Arabian costumes until they begin a striptease (of equal-opportunity nudity, it should be noted). The sequence demonstrates Russell at his best: wit, invention, and a perfect fusing of subject matter with style. Later, Valentino’s termination of his contract with Jesse Lasky (Huntz Hall, The Phynx), of Famous Players-Lasky, takes place on the set of a Western with a series of visual gags enacted just over Lasky’s shoulder. This is how you enliven a stock dialogue scene. Russell also stages some enthusiastic – and convincing – recreations of Valentino’s greatest celluloid hits.

"Every day is Halloween in Tinseltown": Alla Nazimova (Leslie Caron) arrives at Valentino's funeral with style.

Alla Nazimova (Leslie Caron) arrives at Valentino’s funeral with style.

Ultimately, though, the film overstays its welcome, and by the time we are witness to an elaborate boxing match between the actor and a member of the press – the star’s last-ditch effort to prove his masculinity to the public – Valentino seems as dizzy and punch drunk as its subject. This boxing match really occurred, amazingly enough, though it’s unlikely it was anything like the way Russell stages it. The film also reimagines the bout as being the last night of Valentino’s life, which puts the director’s thesis to the foreground: that America tore this Italian immigrant to pieces. (Before the match begins, the Star-Spangled Banner is played, and as Valentino pointedly salutes the flag, the stars and stripes fill the screen.) So thematically Valentino‘s climax is on target, but by then the film has become exhausting. Is it the bomb that its reputation suggests? Not at all. Hollywood historians will quibble over the details, but there’s still enough pure filmmaking on display to allow Valentino to stick in the memory. Russell was a talent, but critics didn’t know what to do with his wild energy – here amplified as he aligns his cinematic sensibilities with Jazz Age excesses of cocaine and sex (and one silver platter stuffed with French fries and gallons of ketchup). Only in retrospect is it easier to appreciate just what he was trying to do. It may not be a stellar biopic, but it’s an appropriate capper to Russell’s eye-popping 70’s spectacles.

Valentino

Posted in Theater Ballroom | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Valentino (1977)

Black Jack (1979)

Black Jack

First we see the French sailor “Black Jack” (Jean Franval, Le Cercle Rouge) – no one can pronounce his true name – hanged for murder following a deadly tavern brawl, and his body is delivered to a widow who makes her money off selling unclaimed bodies to surgeons. (She’s one step removed from a body snatcher.) It’s 1750 York. Though it’s broad daylight, her home is draped in shadows, so we can barely make out what we’re seeing as the body is searched and relieved of its treasures. We can also barely make out what they’re saying: the dialogue is muffled, and the accents are thick. She leaves the body of Black Jack in the care of a young draper’s apprentice named Bartholomew “Tolly” Pickering (Stephen Hirst), who holds a candle over the dead body, and stares as suddenly old Black Jack starts to choke and stir. As the narrator informs us, Black Jack cheated the hangman’s noose by stuffing a bent spoon into his gullet, sparing his windpipe from being crushed. The man, a giant, shatters the window, seizes the boy, and drags him into the woods. So begins the “children’s film” Black Jack (1979), directed by Ken Loach (Kes), a harrowing, raw, and unforgettable work that has somehow managed to be forgotten – that is, until recent revival screenings and a British DVD release. I caught the film a few weeks ago at the Wisconsin Film Festival, and although normally I would take offense at subtitles in an English language film, here it truly makes a difference: Loach’s commitment to naturalism – coupled with the fact that the tight budget didn’t give him the chance to dub the film properly – renders much of the dialogue unintelligible (so much is whispered, mumbled, or drowned in esoteric slang). But Loach finds an accessible beauty in the roughness. The cinematography is by Chris Menges (Michael Collins), who relies upon natural lighting a la Kubrick’s Barry Lyndon (1975), to which this film seems a close relative. Black Jack is a film that immerses the viewer in an authentic-seeming mid-18th century with all of its alien qualities intact. There isn’t a trace of sentimentality, but Loach’s approach establishes an astonishing intimacy, guiding the viewer to a deeply satisfying conclusion.

Black Jack (Jean Franval) seemingly rises from the dead before the eyes of young Tolly (Stephen Hirst).

Black Jack (Jean Franval) seemingly rises from the dead before the eyes of young Tolly (Stephen Hirst).

Its inexact reputation as a children’s film comes from the source material, a 1968 children’s novel by Leon Garfield, who crafted a picaresque in the mold of 18th century novels. Indeed, Black Jack is a novelistic film – you can easily imagine chapter titles dividing the scenes. Black Jack begins to lead his young hostage into a career as a highwayman robbing coaches (Tolly does his best to thwart him), but they become sidetracked by a young girl named Belle (Louise Cooper), who is suffering from a fever that has given her short-term memory and occasionally violent tempers. Her family, thinking her mad, has sent her away to a sanitorium; but during the journey she wanders free, and becomes lost. Eventually she finds herself under the care of Tolly, who decides she’s his personal responsibility. The three fall into the company of a traveling fair that includes a fortune teller, a troupe of performing dwarfs (whom Terry Gilliam would soon cast as the Time Bandits), and an old charlatan, Dr. Carmody (Packie Byrne), who hawks a miracle cure for aging with the assistance of a boy named Hatch (Andrew Bennett), a budding con artist himself. While Black Jack sets out on a path toward redemption – with a few stumbles along the way – the boy Hatch proves far more dangerous, and a canny blackmailer when he uncovers Belle’s true identity.

Tolly and Belle (Louise Cooper), the girl he means to rehabilitate from her "madness."

Tolly and Belle (Louise Cooper), the girl he means to rehabilitate from her “madness.”

With Black Jack‘s documentary approach, the camera races to catch up with the characters as they move through woods or alleyways; it roves left and right as it strives to pick out its protagonists from the crowd, as though we are lost in the cacophony of 18th century village life, trying to decipher the dialogue amidst a tumult of competing voices and eccentric characters. Loach gathered a cast mostly of nonprofessionals. Its two young leads were ordinary schoolkids from working-class families: the son of a lorry driver and the daughter of a miner. Their unaffected performances give the film a surprising emotional weight. Free of any manufactured tension and without overt manipulation, the film earns a particularly grisly moment set in the claustrophobic sanitorium in its final reel, a scene that seems straight out of a horror movie (I was reminded of the Val Lewton picture Bedlam). But this is a marvelous little film, whatever the intended audience. The good guys win, the villains are punished, the sinners are redeemed, and the delusions of “madness” prove to be divine foresight – all delivered with the understated pragmatism embodied by Tolly, the draper’s apprentice.

Black Jack

Posted in Theater Midnight Matinee | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Black Jack (1979)

Cat People (1982)

Cat People

The early 80’s saw a flood of fantasy and horror pictures as New Hollywood directors, in answer to the studios’ demand for the next Star Wars (1977), paid homage to their childhood matinee memories with grittier, more effects-driven, and more adult visions of the fantastic. John Landis made An American Werewolf in London (1981) after old werewolf movies; John Carpenter remade The Thing (1982); John Milius channeled The Vikings (1958), Kwaidan (1964), and Japanese samurai movies with Conan the Barbarian (1982); and Paul Schrader, hot off American Gigolo (1980), used his new cachet to helm Cat People (1982), a remake of the 1942 Cat People from director Jacques Tourneur and producer Val Lewton. To call the original film a classic is an understatement: it is simply one of the finest horror films ever made, and the most iconic in the short-lived but highly-treasured series of noir-infused supernatural shockers that emerged from Lewton’s contract at RKO. Yet Tourneur’s picture is also, on the surface, a modest little B-picture, making the most of a slim RKO budget, and relying more on dialogue and suggestion than the monsters-on-the-rampage action of the Universal Studios horror films; with audiences it lacks the name recognition of a Frankenstein, Wolf Man, or Dracula vehicle, and it’s an unusual choice for a big-budget Universal remake. (The studio’s Psycho II, released the following year, was much more inevitable.) So it has the feel of a pet project for Schrader, much like Carpenter’s The Thing: a childhood favorite reimagined with an R rating. The irony wouldn’t be lost on critics. The Tourneur/Lewton film has sex on its mind, true, but, as with its supernatural elements, leaves it to the viewer’s imagination to fill in those empty spaces draped with black shadows. By contrast, Schrader leaves nothing unstated. Nothing is subtle. It’s a Paul Schrader film, and it’s the early 80’s: sex, blood, and style trump all.

Oliver (John Heard) prepares to tranquilize a deadly panther.

Oliver (John Heard) prepares to tranquilize a deadly panther.

As with the original film, the plot concerns an immigrant named Irena (Nastassja Kinski, Tess, To the Devil a Daughter), a virgin who comes to believe that she’s from an ancient race of shapechangers, and sex will trigger her transformation into a deadly cat. This news is fed to her by her brother Paul (Malcolm McDowell, A Clockwork Orange), who welcomes her to New Orleans by telling her outright that he’s the only man with whom she can practice safe sex. Irena is much more interested in Oliver (John Heard, C.H.U.D.), who works at the New Orleans Zoo and is first seen climbing a ladder to tranquilize a panther on the rampage – who is really Paul in animal form. A mutual attraction leads Oliver to snagging Irena a job at the zoo’s gift shop. Their relationship only becomes more intense when a police raid on Paul’s apartment – human remains are discovered in a cage in his cellar – has Irena moving in with Oliver. Soon Irena finds herself anxious to unleash her inner beast. It should be noted that in the original film, the story never threatens to become a pro-abstinence parable: Lewton and Tourneur are more interested in Irena’s isolation, loneliness, jealousy, and resentment, as her unwillingness to consummate her marriage leads her husband to take a greater interest in Alice, a more vivacious co-worker. (A recurring theme in Lewton’s films are isolation and suicidal misery.) But the key difference with Schrader’s Cat People is that Kinski’s Irena wants sex. As Paul tells her, she’s not in love with Oliver: it’s simply lust. (There is no talk of marriage in this film, either.) In the more liberated 80’s, a woman has the right to enjoy her sexuality. Late in the film, she gives Oliver a choice: kill her or let her be free. Oliver compromises in a kinky way. He ties her to the bed so they can have sex with minimal risk of injury. This is reinforced in the film’s final image, which shows us an Irena who is “free” in only one sense of the word – she is still essentially confined, even if she can finally be herself.

Irena witnesses an attack at the zoo.

Irena witnesses an attack at the zoo.

Lest anyone think Schrader is desecrating a classic, there are plenty of loving references. RKO Pictures gets a shout-out in the opening titles, and Schrader ensures that the most famous scenes of the original are all here, albeit in altered shapes. The zoo (a studio set) bears a close resemblance to the original’s; a mysterious woman (Neva Gage) approaches Irena in a bar to identify her as a fellow cat (“Mi hermana!”) before abruptly leaving the film; the notorious stalking of Alice through dark streets in the original film, in which a screeching bus suddenly appears just when we expect a pouncing cat, is reproduced here in a park in daylight, though our Alice (Annette O’Toole, 48 Hrs.) is startled by both a bus and an aggressively affectionate Great Dane. And the trapped-in-a-swimming-pool scene is replicated almost shot for shot, with the key difference that O’Toole is topless for the duration. This, along with the kinky sex – incestuous overtures and bondage – would lead many to accuse the film of being a very cynical remake. When I first saw the film, I found it a bit dull, and its sexual bluntness peculiar and bordering on camp. But a reassessment courtesy Shout! Factory’s recent Blu-Ray release reveals the film as one of the sturdier in the early-80’s run of slick, adult fantasy films. It is camp, and I think deliberately so, but it works because it’s played with sincerity by the cast. McDowell doesn’t chew the scenery quite as much as he probably would today, but he nonetheless makes the most of a character defined by his lust for eating people and seducing his virginal sister: in one scene he hops cat-like onto the edge of his sister’s bed and gazes at her with giant, hungry eyes; in another, he guides Irena through an orange-hued desert to a tree whose boughs are laden with panthers, telling her, “Before we become human again, we must kill.” Even Ed Begley Jr. (This is Spinal Tap) plays it straight as a zoo worker who gets his arm ripped off with gallons of gushing blood – which splatter symbolically across Irena’s white shoes. (Schrader isn’t content with the relative subtlety of symbols. Later, when Irena loses her virginity, she rubs the blood of her broken hymen across her lips.)

Irena (Nastassja Kinski) prepares to repel an incestuous advance by her brother Paul.

Irena (Nastassja Kinski) prepares to repel an incestuous advance by her brother Paul.

Decades later, the original Cat People is still widely available and remains an untouched classic, so it’s easier to safely regard Schrader’s interpretation as something separate, alternate: a Paul Schrader film. And in that regard it’s one of his key works, playing explicitly with his central obsession of sexual repression. Yet the film almost resists analysis because, as I’ve said, it contains no subtext. It’s all right there in the dialogue and images, everything explicit. Like an 80’s music video – and so many of its cinematic contemporaries – it’s a film of style, the work of a sensualist in love with the power of images and music. The synthesizer-driven score is by musician Giorgio Moroder, who had scored Schrader’s American Gigolo and would go on to create the 80’s-rock cut of Fritz Lang’s Metropolis (1984). David Bowie moans over the opening credits, constantly threatening to burst into song, which doesn’t occur until the final credits (a part of the repression theme, perhaps): the rather awesome “Cat People (Putting Out Fire)” would later be reappropriated in Tarantino’s Inglourious Basterds (2009), which has no cat people in it. I still find Schrader’s film slow-moving (it’s too long) and rather redundant, which is the problem with having the characters speaking directly about what is already clear in the images. But here is Nastassja Kinski, with her absurdly sensual lips and gigantic eyes – and, when she strips off her clothes, a lean, sinewy body – the most perfectly cast feline female this side of Simone Simon. I’ve come around a bit on this film. Schrader’s Cat People is absurd, over-the-top, and utterly silly, but it’s also unique, eccentric, and as restless as a cat in heat.

Cat People

Posted in Theater Caligari | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Cat People (1982)